Lamar
W-L: (12- 4) PR = 79.5269Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 204 H St Pius X ( 1-10, 67.4) 16- 3 211 H Ridge Point ( 8- 7, 83.3) 2-13 225 A Awty International ( 0- 9, 62.2) 10- 2 228 H Klein ( 1-10, 79.5) 5- 2 306 H St Thomas ( 8- 6, 78.5) 6- 4 319 H Atascocita ( 5-10, 76.5) 7-10 321 H Bellaire ( 6- 8, 76.8) 7- 5 328 A Concordia Lutheran ( 7-11, 77.4) 14- 7 401 A Emery-Weiner ( 4- 6, 70.5) 14- 1 408 H Westside ( 0- 7, 75.2) 11- 4 415 H Clear Springs ( 2-11, 74.4) 17- 9 417 A George Ranch (14- 6, 80.6) 7-11 421 A Atascocita ( 5-10, 76.5) 9- 4 423 H George Ranch (14- 6, 80.6) 14-12 426 A St Thomas ( 8- 6, 78.5) 11-10 503 N Fort Worth CDS (10- 7, 80.5) 7- 8
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
204 H St Pius X 16- 3 13 13 0.00
211 H Ridge Point 2-13 -11 -3 -1.76
225 A Awty International 10- 2 8 17 0.00
228 H Klein 5- 2 3 1 + 2.43
306 H St Thomas 6- 4 2 2 0.46
319 H Atascocita 7-10 -3 4 --- -6.52
321 H Bellaire 7- 5 2 3 -1.28
328 A Concordia Lutheran 14- 7 7 2 + 3.35
401 A Emery-Weiner 14- 1 13 8 0.00
408 H Westside 11- 4 7 5 0.14
415 H Clear Springs 17- 9 8 6 0.00
417 A George Ranch 7-11 -4 -2 - -2.40
421 A Atascocita 9- 4 5 3 + 2.49
423 H George Ranch 14-12 2 -1 + 2.59
426 A St Thomas 11-10 1 1 0.47
503 N Fort Worth CDS 7- 8 -1 -1 0.02
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 319 H Atascocita 7-10 -3 4 --- -6.52 417 A George Ranch 7-11 -4 -2 - -2.40 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 228 H Klein 5- 2 3 1 + 2.43 328 A Concordia Lutheran 14- 7 7 2 + 3.35 421 A Atascocita 9- 4 5 3 + 2.49 423 H George Ranch 14-12 2 -1 + 2.59 |
Lamar Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alamo Heights | Alamo Heights | Alamo Heights | ||
| All Saints Episcopal | Lamar | Lamar | ||
| Allen | Allen | Allen | ||
| Anderson | Anderson | Anderson | ||
| Antonian College Pre | Lamar | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Lamar | |
| Atascocita | Lamar | Lamar 7- 1 vs 3- 4 | ||
| Austin | Austin | Austin | ||
| Awty International | Lamar | Lamar | ||
| Bellaire | Lamar | Lamar | ||
| Bishop Lynch | Lamar | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Lamar | |
| Boerne | Lamar | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Lamar | |
| Bowie | Bowie | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 0) | Bowie | |
| Bridge LC | Bridge LC | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Bridge LC | |
| Canyon | Lamar | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Lamar | |
| Central Catholic | Lamar | Lamar | ||
| Clear Springs | Lamar | Lamar | ||
| Concordia Lutheran | Lamar | Lamar | ||
| Coppell | Lamar | Lamar | ||
| Coronado El Paso | Lamar | Lamar | ||
| Cumberland Academy | Lamar | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Lamar | |
| Cypress Woods | Cypress Woods | Cypress Woods | ||
| Dallas Jesuit | Dallas Jesuit | Dallas Jesuit | ||
| Dallas Jesuit B | Dallas Jesuit B | Dallas Jesuit B | ||
| Dripping Springs | Dripping Springs | Dripping Springs | ||
| Emery-Weiner | Lamar | Lamar | ||
| Episcopal Houston | Episcopal Houston | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Episcopal Houston | |
| Episcopal Dallas | Episcopal Dallas | Episcopal Dallas | ||
| Flower Mound | Flower Mound | Flower Mound | ||
| Fort Worth CDS | Fort Worth CDS | Fort Worth CDS | ||
| Friendswood | Lamar | insuffient: ( 3- 3)( 2- 2) | Lamar | |
| Frisco | Frisco | Frisco | ||
| Gateway | Gateway | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Gateway | |
| George Ranch | George Ranch | insuffient: ( 7- 3)( 6- 3) | George Ranch | |
| Georgetown | Georgetown | Georgetown | ||
| Grapevine | Grapevine | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Grapevine | |
| Greenhill | Lamar | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Lamar | |
| Guyer | Lamar | Lamar | ||
| Hebron | Hebron | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Hebron | |
| Highland Park | Highland Park | Highland Park | ||
| Highland Park B | Highland Park B | Highland Park B | ||
| Hillcrest | Lamar | Lamar | ||
| Houston Christian | Houston Christian | insuffient: ( 5- 2)( 4- 1) | Houston Christian | |
| Hyde Park | Hyde Park | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 1) | Hyde Park | |
| John Paul II | Lamar | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Lamar | |
| Katy | Katy | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Katy | |
| Keller | Keller | Keller | ||
| Kingwood | Kingwood | insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 4- 0) | Kingwood | |
| Kinkaid | Kinkaid | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Kinkaid | |
| Klein | Lamar | Lamar | ||
| Lake Travis | Lake Travis | Lake Travis | ||
| Liberty Hill | Lamar | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 1) | Lamar | |
| Lovejoy | Lovejoy | Lovejoy | ||
| Magnolia | Magnolia | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) | Magnolia | |
| McKinney | McKinney | McKinney | ||
| Memorial | Memorial | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Memorial | |
| New Braunfels | Lamar | Lamar | ||
| Parish Episcopal | Lamar | Lamar | ||
| Pearland | Pearland | insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 4- 0) | Pearland | |
| Plano | Plano | Plano | ||
| Plano East | Plano East | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 0) | Plano East | |
| Plano West | Plano West | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Plano West | |
| Prosper | Prosper | Prosper | ||
| Reagan | Lamar | Lamar | ||
| Regents School Aust | Lamar | Lamar | ||
| Ridge Point | Ridge Point | Ridge Point | ||
| Rockwall | Rockwall | Rockwall | ||
| Rouse | Lamar | Lamar | ||
| Santa Fe LC | Santa Fe LC | Santa Fe LC | ||
| Smithson Valley | Smithson Valley | Smithson Valley | ||
| Southlake | Southlake | Southlake | ||
| St Andrews | St Andrews | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | St Andrews | |
| St Johns | St Johns | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | St Johns | |
| St Marks | St Marks | St Marks | ||
| St Marys Hall | Lamar | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Lamar | |
| St Michaels | Lamar | Lamar | ||
| St Pius X | Lamar | Lamar | ||
| St Stephens | St Stephens | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | St Stephens | |
| St Thomas | Lamar | Lamar | ||
| Stony Point | Lamar | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Lamar | |
| Strake Jesuit | Strake Jesuit | Strake Jesuit | ||
| Stratford | Stratford | tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 1) | Stratford | |
| Tascosa | Tascosa | Tascosa | ||
| TMI Episcopal | TMI Episcopal | TMI Episcopal | ||
| Trinity Valley | Lamar | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) | Lamar | |
| Vandegrift | Vandegrift | Vandegrift | ||
| Vista Ridge | Vista Ridge | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Vista Ridge | |
| Westlake | Westlake | Westlake | ||
| Westlake B | Westlake B | Westlake B | ||
| Westside | Lamar | Lamar | ||
| Westwood | Lamar | Lamar | ||
| Woodlands | Woodlands | Woodlands | ||
| Woodlands B | Lamar | Lamar 4- 3 vs 2- 3 |
PowerWise = 36
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.29
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H St Pius X ( 1-10, 67.4) 16- 3 -32.51 5.18 -0.51 0.83 3.88
0 H Ridge Point ( 8- 7, 83.3) 2-13 -16.63 21.06 -0.51 0.83 -14.23
0 A Awty Internati ( 0- 9, 62.2) 10- 2 -37.69 1.00 0.51 0.83 1.25
0 H Klein ( 1-10, 79.5) 5- 2 -20.43 17.25 -0.51 0.83 13.91
0 H St Thomas ( 8- 6, 78.5) 6- 4 -21.41 16.28 -0.51 0.83 13.10
0 H Atascocita ( 5-10, 76.5) 7-10 -23.39 14.30 -0.51 0.83 -19.85
0 H Bellaire ( 6- 8, 76.8) 7- 5 -23.14 14.54 -0.51 0.83 11.66
0 A Concordia Luth ( 7-11, 77.4) 14- 7 -22.53 15.16 0.51 0.83 13.01
0 A Emery-Weiner ( 4- 6, 70.5) 14- 1 -29.36 8.33 0.51 0.83 7.34
0 H Westside ( 0- 7, 75.2) 11- 4 -24.73 12.96 -0.51 0.83 10.34
0 H Clear Springs ( 2-11, 74.4) 17- 9 -25.51 12.18 -0.51 0.83 9.69
0 A George Ranch (14- 6, 80.6) 7-11 -19.28 18.41 0.51 0.83 -15.59
0 A Atascocita ( 5-10, 76.5) 9- 4 -23.39 14.30 0.51 0.83 12.30
0 H George Ranch (14- 6, 80.6) 14-12 -19.28 18.41 -0.51 0.83 14.87
0 A St Thomas ( 8- 6, 78.5) 11-10 -21.41 16.28 0.51 0.83 13.95
0 N Fort Worth CDS (10- 7, 80.5) 7- 8 -19.35 18.33 -0.00 0.83 -16.08
------
59.56
|
winning pts = 125.3119 losing points = -65.7494
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------