Laconia
W-L: (11- 5) PR = 88.6459Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 414 H Kearsarge (10- 6, 88.1) 15- 4 416 A John Stark ( 3-11, 81.5) 13- 1 421 H Campbell (12- 6, 88.8) 10- 9 423 A Coe-Brown (17- 1, 93.1) 5-13 506 A Lebanon ( 8- 8, 85.5) 16- 7 507 H Plymouth Regional (15- 2, 89.8) 6- 7 509 H Pelham ( 7- 8, 85.6) 21- 9 512 A ConVal ( 9- 6, 87.0) 6- 9 514 H Trinity Manchester ( 3-11, 82.2) 14- 9 515 H Milford ( 1-13, 78.5) 15- 0 519 A Bow (11- 4, 89.9) 2-11 521 A Inter-Lakes-Moultonb ( 1-13, 82.3) 14- 6 527 H Hopkinton (12- 4, 90.7) 14-12 530 A Kennett ( 4-10, 82.8) 13- 5 605 H Gilford ( 6- 9, 82.9) 18- 4 609 A Hopkinton (12- 4, 90.7) 8-16
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
414 H Kearsarge 15- 4 11 1 ++ 4.06
416 A John Stark 13- 1 12 7 0.00
421 H Campbell 10- 9 1 0 0.78
423 A Coe-Brown 5-13 -8 -5 -0.22
506 A Lebanon 16- 7 9 3 + 2.25
507 H Plymouth Regional 6- 7 -1 -1 -0.25
509 H Pelham 21- 9 12 3 1.58
512 A ConVal 6- 9 -3 1 -- -4.26
514 H Trinity Manchester 14- 9 5 7 0.00
515 H Milford 15- 0 15 11 0.00
519 A Bow 2-11 -9 -2 - -3.39
521 A Inter-Lakes-Moultonb 14- 6 8 6 0.00
527 H Hopkinton 14-12 2 -2 + 3.68
530 A Kennett 13- 5 8 5 0.00
605 H Gilford 18- 4 14 6 0.00
609 A Hopkinton 8-16 -8 -2 - -2.57
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 512 A ConVal 6- 9 -3 1 -- -4.26 519 A Bow 2-11 -9 -2 - -3.39 609 A Hopkinton 8-16 -8 -2 - -2.57 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 414 H Kearsarge 15- 4 11 1 ++ 4.06 506 A Lebanon 16- 7 9 3 + 2.25 527 H Hopkinton 14-12 2 -2 + 3.68 |
Laconia Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvirne | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Bedford | Bedford | Bedford | ||
| Bishop Brady | Laconia | insuffient: ( 9- 5)( 8- 5) | Laconia | |
| Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Bow | Bow | Bow | ||
| Campbell | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Coe-Brown | Coe-Brown | Coe-Brown | ||
| Concord | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| ConVal | ConVal | ConVal | ||
| Derryfield | Derryfield | Derryfield | ||
| Dover | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Exeter HS | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Gilford | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Goffstown | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Hanover | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Hollis-Brookline | Hollis-Brookline | Hollis-Brookline | ||
| Hopkinton | Hopkinton | insuffient: ( 8- 3)( 9- 2) | Hopkinton | |
| Inter-Lakes-Moultonb | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| John Stark | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Kearsarge | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Keene-Monadnock | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Kennett | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Kingswood | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Lebanon | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Londonderry | Londonderry | Londonderry | ||
| Manchester Memorial- | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Merrimack | Merrimack | Merrimack | ||
| Merrimack Valley | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Milford | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Nashua North | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Nashua South | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Oyster River-Newmark | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Pelham | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Pembroke Academy | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Portsmouth | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Salem | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Souhegan | Laconia | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Laconia | |
| Spaulding | Laconia | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Laconia | |
| St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Stevens | Laconia | Laconia 9- 5 vs 0-13 | ||
| Timberlane | Timberlane | Timberlane | ||
| Trinity Manchester | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Windham | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Winnacunnet | Winnacunnet | Winnacunnet |
PowerWise = 29
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 16.30
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Kearsarge (10- 6, 88.1) 15- 4 -11.82 14.78 -0.38 1.02 14.67
0 A John Stark ( 3-11, 81.5) 13- 1 -18.40 8.20 0.38 1.02 8.74
0 H Campbell (12- 6, 88.8) 10- 9 -11.10 15.50 -0.38 1.02 15.40
0 A Coe-Brown (17- 1, 93.1) 5-13 -6.85 19.75 0.38 1.02 -6.59
0 A Lebanon ( 8- 8, 85.5) 16- 7 -14.38 12.22 0.38 1.02 12.83
0 H Plymouth Regio (15- 2, 89.8) 6- 7 -10.13 16.47 -0.38 1.02 -10.70
0 H Pelham ( 7- 8, 85.6) 21- 9 -14.30 12.29 -0.38 1.02 12.14
0 A ConVal ( 9- 6, 87.0) 6- 9 -12.89 13.70 0.38 1.02 -12.75
0 H Trinity Manche ( 3-11, 82.2) 14- 9 -17.70 8.89 -0.38 1.02 8.67
0 H Milford ( 1-13, 78.5) 15- 0 -21.44 5.16 -0.38 1.02 4.87
0 A Bow (11- 4, 89.9) 2-11 -10.02 16.58 0.38 1.02 -9.82
0 A Inter-Lakes-Mo ( 1-13, 82.3) 14- 6 -17.57 9.03 0.38 1.02 9.58
0 H Hopkinton (12- 4, 90.7) 14-12 -9.20 17.40 -0.38 1.02 17.34
0 A Kennett ( 4-10, 82.8) 13- 5 -17.09 9.50 0.38 1.02 10.07
0 H Gilford ( 6- 9, 82.9) 18- 4 -16.97 9.62 -0.38 1.02 9.42
0 A Hopkinton (12- 4, 90.7) 8-16 -9.20 17.40 0.38 1.02 -8.98
------
74.88
|
winning pts = 123.7247 losing points = -48.8438
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------