---    UPDATED: 07-28-25 23:58 PDT

safe3step boys King Philip Regional 1
  
King Philip Regional  
W-L: (15- 5) PR = 94.1912

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 331 H North Attleboro (11- 8, 90.6) 20-10 402 H Milford (13- 8, 88.7) 11- 3 404 A Nauset (17- 5, 94.9) 9-11 407 A Foxborough ( 5-14, 88.2) 11- 4 410 H Sharon (10- 7, 92.9) 18-10 414 A Mansfield (20- 2, 98.1) 9-18 416 H Attleboro ( 5-13, 86.0) 15- 2 417 A Bridgewater-Raynham ( 9-10, 89.6) 8- 4 421 H Bishop Feehan (17- 3, 95.6) 10-18 423 H Nashoba Regional (15- 6, 92.7) 15- 3 425 A Catholic Memorial ( 8-12, 94.1) 4- 8 428 A Oliver Ames ( 3-14, 84.8) 20- 4 430 A Taunton ( 2-15, 78.8) 19- 0 505 H Canton ( 9- 8, 89.8) 11- 3 507 A Stoughton ( 3-15, 80.3) 17- 4 512 A North Attleboro (11- 8, 90.6) 11- 6 519 H Franklin (15- 6, 94.1) 11- 4 521 H Hopkinton ( 9-10, 90.0) 15- 4 530 H Canton ( 9- 8, 89.8) 9- 6 603 A Walpole (17- 4, 96.0) 5-10

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   331 H North Attleboro        20-10      10     4           0.78
   402 H Milford                11- 3       8     6           0.00
   404 A Nauset                  9-11      -2    -1          -0.65
   407 A Foxborough             11- 4       7     5           0.00
   410 H Sharon                 18-10       8     2    +      3.12
   414 A Mansfield               9-18      -9    -5          -0.47
   416 H Attleboro              15- 2      13     9           0.00
   417 A Bridgewater-Raynham     8- 4       4     4           0.06
   421 H Bishop Feehan          10-18      -8    -1    --    -4.19
   423 H Nashoba Regional       15- 3      12     2    +      2.90
   425 A Catholic Memorial       4- 8      -4    -1    -     -3.44
   428 A Oliver Ames            20- 4      16     9           0.00
   430 A Taunton                19- 0      19    15           0.00
   505 H Canton                 11- 3       8     5           0.00
   507 A Stoughton              17- 4      13    13           0.00
   512 A North Attleboro        11- 6       5     3    +      2.05
   519 H Franklin               11- 4       7     1    ++     4.24
   521 H Hopkinton              15- 4      11     5           0.15
   530 H Canton                  9- 6       3     5          -2.00
   603 A Walpole                 5-10      -5    -2    -     -2.53

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   421 H Bishop Feehan          10-18      -8    -1    --    -4.19
   425 A Catholic Memorial       4- 8      -4    -1    -     -3.44
   603 A Walpole                 5-10      -5    -2    -     -2.53

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   519 H Franklin               11- 4       7     1    ++     4.24
   410 H Sharon                 18-10       8     2    +      3.12
   423 H Nashoba Regional       15- 3      12     2    +      2.90
   512 A North Attleboro        11- 6       5     3    +      2.05

King Philip Regional Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Abington King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) King Philip Regional
Acton Boxborough Acton Boxborough Acton Boxborough   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Agawam King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Algonquin King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) King Philip Regional
Amesbury King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Amherst-Pelham Reg King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
AMSA Charter King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) King Philip Regional
Andover HS Andover HS   Andover HS
Apponequet Regional King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Archbishop Williams King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) King Philip Regional
Arlington Catholic King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Arlington HS King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Ashland King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Assabet Valley RVT King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Attleboro King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
Auburn King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Barnstable King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) King Philip Regional
Bay Path RVT King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Bedford King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Belchertown King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Bellingham King Philip Regional King Philip Regional   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Belmont King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Beverly King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Billerica Memorial Billerica Memorial Billerica Memorial   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Bishop Feehan Bishop Feehan Bishop Feehan  
Bishop Fenwick King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Bishop Stang King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) King Philip Regional
Blackstone Valley RV King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Blue Hills RVT King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Boston College HS Boston College HS Boston College HS   4- 0 vs 2- 2
Boston Latin School King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Bourne King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Braintree King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) King Philip Regional
Bridgewater-Raynham King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
Bristol-Plymouth RVT King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Brookline King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Burlington King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) King Philip Regional
Cambridge Rindge-Lat King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Canton King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
Cape Cod Academy King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Cape Cod Tech King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Cardinal Spellman King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Catholic Memorial Catholic Memorial Catholic Memorial  
Central Catholic King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Chelmsford King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Chicopee Comprehensi King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Cohasset Cohasset tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Cohasset
Concord-Carlisle Concord-Carlisle insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Concord-Carlisle
Danvers King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Dartmouth King Philip Regional King Philip Regional   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Dedham King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Dennis-Yarmouth Regi King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Dighton-Rehoboth Reg King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) King Philip Regional
Doherty Memorial King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Dover-Sherborn King Philip Regional tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) King Philip Regional
Dracut Dracut   Dracut
Duxbury Duxbury insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 4- 0) Duxbury
East Bridgewater King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
East Longmeadow King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Essex Tech King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Fairhaven King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) King Philip Regional
Falmouth Academy King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Falmouth HS Falmouth HS insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) Falmouth HS
Foxborough King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
Framingham King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) King Philip Regional
Franklin King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
Gloucester King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Grafton King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) King Philip Regional
Granby King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Greater Lowell RVT King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Greater New Bedford King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Groton-Dunstable Reg King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Hamilton-Wenham Regi King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Hanover King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) King Philip Regional
Haverhill King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Hingham Hingham tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Hingham
Holliston King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Hoosac Valley King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Hopkinton King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
Hudson King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Hull King Philip Regional tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) King Philip Regional
Ipswich King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Lenox/Lee King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Leominster King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Lexington King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) King Philip Regional
Lincoln-Sudbury Regi Lincoln-Sudbury Regi   Lincoln-Sudbury Regi
Littleton King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Longmeadow Longmeadow tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Longmeadow
Lowell King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Lowell Catholic King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Lunenburg King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Lynn Classical-Engli King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Lynnfield King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Malden King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Malden Catholic King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Manchester-Essex Reg King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield  
Marblehead King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Marshfield Marshfield tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Marshfield
Marthas Vineyard King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) King Philip Regional
Masconomet King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Mashpee King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
McCann Technical King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Medfield Medfield tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Medfield
Medford King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Medway King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) King Philip Regional
Melrose King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Methuen King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Middleborough King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Milford King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
Milton HS King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) King Philip Regional
Minnechaug Regional King Philip Regional tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) King Philip Regional
Minuteman Regional King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Monomoy Regional King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Monson King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Montachusett RVT King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Mount Greylock Regio King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Mystic Valley Charte King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Nantucket King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Nashoba Regional King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
Nashoba Valley Tech King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Natick King Philip Regional tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) King Philip Regional
Nauset Nauset Nauset  
Needham King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) King Philip Regional
New Bedford King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Newburyport Newburyport   Newburyport
Newton North King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Newton South King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Nipmuc Regional King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) King Philip Regional
North Andover King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
North Attleboro King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
North Middlesex King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
North Quincy Co-op King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
North Reading King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Northampton King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Northeast Metro RVT King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Norton King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Norwell Norwell insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Norwell
Norwood King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Oakmont Regional King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Old Colony RVT King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Old Rochester Region King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Oliver Ames King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
Peabody Vets Memoria King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Pembroke King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Pentucket Regional King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Pittsfield King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Plymouth North King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) King Philip Regional
Plymouth South King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Pope Francis Prep King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Reading Memorial Reading Memorial   Reading Memorial
Revere King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Rockland King Philip Regional tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) King Philip Regional
Salem King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Sandwich King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) King Philip Regional
Saugus King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Scituate Scituate insuffient: ( 0- 3)( 1- 2) Scituate
Seekonk King Philip Regional King Philip Regional   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Sharon King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
Shawsheen Valley RVT King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) King Philip Regional
Shepherd Hill King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Shrewsbury King Philip Regional King Philip Regional   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Silver Lake King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) King Philip Regional
Smith VoTech King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Somerset Berkley King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) King Philip Regional
Somerville King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
South Hadley King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
South Shore RVT King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Southeastern RVT King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) King Philip Regional
Springfield Central King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
St Bernards King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
St John Paul II King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
St Johns Prep Danver St Johns Prep Danver insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) St Johns Prep Danver
St Johns Shrewsbury King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) King Philip Regional
St Marys Lynn King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
St Marys Westfield King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Stoneham King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Stoughton King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
Sturgis Charter East King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Swampscott King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Tantasqua Regional King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Taunton King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
Tech Boston Academy King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Tewksbury Memorial King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Tri-County RVT King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Triton Regional King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Tyngsborough King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Upper Cape Cod RVT King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Wachusett Regional King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) King Philip Regional
Wahconah King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Wakefield Memorial King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Walpole Walpole Walpole  
Waltham King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) King Philip Regional
Watertown King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Wayland King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Wellesley King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 3) ( 0- 3) King Philip Regional
West Springfield King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Westborough King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Westfield King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Westford Academy Westford Academy   Westford Academy
Weston King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) King Philip Regional
Westport King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Westwood Westwood tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Westwood
Weymouth King Philip Regional King Philip Regional   2- 1 vs 0- 3
Whitman-Hanson King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Whittier RVT King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Wilmington King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Winchester Winchester   Winchester
Winthrop King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Woburn Memorial King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Xaverian Brothers Xaverian Brothers Xaverian Brothers   2- 0 vs 0- 2

PowerWise = 183


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 18.05

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H North Attlebor  (11- 8, 90.6)    20-10       -9.29      23.25      -0.63         0.90            20.40
   0 H Milford         (13- 8, 88.7)    11- 3      -11.22      21.33      -0.63         0.90            18.67
   0 A Nauset          (17- 5, 94.9)     9-11       -5.00      27.54       0.63         0.90            -3.94
   0 A Foxborough      ( 5-14, 88.2)    11- 4      -11.73      20.81       0.63         0.90            19.35
   0 H Sharon          (10- 7, 92.9)    18-10       -6.96      25.58      -0.63         0.90            22.51
   0 A Mansfield       (20- 2, 98.1)     9-18       -1.81      30.73       0.63         0.90            -1.06
   0 H Attleboro       ( 5-13, 86.0)    15- 2      -13.91      18.63      -0.63         0.90            16.24
   0 A Bridgewater-Ra  ( 9-10, 89.6)     8- 4      -10.28      22.26       0.63         0.90            20.65
   0 H Bishop Feehan   (17- 3, 95.6)    10-18       -4.26      28.28      -0.63         0.90            -4.42
   0 H Nashoba Region  (15- 6, 92.7)    15- 3       -7.18      25.36      -0.63         0.90            22.31
   0 A Catholic Memor  ( 8-12, 94.1)     4- 8       -5.78      26.76       0.63         0.90            -4.64
   0 A Oliver Ames     ( 3-14, 84.8)    20- 4      -15.05      17.49       0.63         0.90            16.35
   0 A Taunton         ( 2-15, 78.8)    19- 0      -21.09      11.45       0.63         0.90            10.90
   0 H Canton          ( 9- 8, 89.8)    11- 3      -10.07      22.47      -0.63         0.90            19.70
   0 A Stoughton       ( 3-15, 80.3)    17- 4      -19.60      12.94       0.63         0.90            12.25
   0 A North Attlebor  (11- 8, 90.6)    11- 6       -9.29      23.25       0.63         0.90            21.55
   0 H Franklin        (15- 6, 94.1)    11- 4       -5.84      26.70      -0.63         0.90            23.52
   0 H Hopkinton       ( 9-10, 90.0)    15- 4       -9.92      22.62      -0.63         0.90            19.84
   0 H Canton          ( 9- 8, 89.8)     9- 6      -10.07      22.47      -0.63         0.90            19.70
   0 A Walpole         (17- 4, 96.0)     5-10       -3.87      28.67       0.63         0.90            -2.92
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       266.99

winning pts = 283.9696 losing points = -16.9812

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------