JL Mann Academy
W-L: ( 6- 6) PR = 90.9605Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 226 H Boiling Springs (13- 4, 95.3) 5-16 227 A Dutch Fork ( 4-11, 85.3) 10- 4 307 A TL Hanna ( 7- 8, 84.8) 18- 3 312 A Dorman (15- 4, 93.3) 12-17 314 H Woodmont ( 4- 8, 80.1) 19- 2 328 H Hillcrest ( 4- 5, 83.3) 18- 4 401 A Eastside ( 9- 8, 90.5) 15- 5 402 H Spartanburg ( 8- 8, 89.7) 14- 7 407 H Christ Church Episco (10- 7, 93.1) 5-10 409 A Greenville ( 9- 4, 91.7) 8- 9 414 A Mauldin (13- 4, 93.2) 6-10 422 A Dorman (15- 4, 93.3) 8-11
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
226 H Boiling Springs 5-16 -11 -4 -0.95
227 A Dutch Fork 10- 4 6 5 0.00
307 A TL Hanna 18- 3 15 6 0.00
312 A Dorman 12-17 -5 -3 - -2.36
314 H Woodmont 19- 2 17 11 0.00
328 H Hillcrest 18- 4 14 8 0.00
401 A Eastside 15- 5 10 0 ++ 4.91
402 H Spartanburg 14- 7 7 2 + 3.41
407 H Christ Church Episco 5-10 -5 -2 - -3.23
409 A Greenville 8- 9 -1 -1 0.08
414 A Mauldin 6-10 -4 -3 -1.46
422 A Dorman 8-11 -3 -3 -0.36
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 312 A Dorman 12-17 -5 -3 - -2.36 407 H Christ Church Episco 5-10 -5 -2 - -3.23 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 401 A Eastside 15- 5 10 0 ++ 4.91 402 H Spartanburg 14- 7 7 2 + 3.41 |
JL Mann Academy Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC Flora | AC Flora | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | AC Flora | |
| Academic Magnet Char | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | ||
| Aiken | JL Mann Academy | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | JL Mann Academy | |
| Atlantic Collegiate | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | ||
| Beaufort | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | ||
| Bishop England | Bishop England | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Bishop England | |
| Bluffton | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | ||
| Blythewood | JL Mann Academy | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | JL Mann Academy | |
| Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | ||
| Byrnes | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy 4- 4 vs 2- 6 | ||
| Camden Military Acad | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | ||
| Carolina Forest | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | ||
| Catawba Ridge | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Chapin | Chapin | insuffient: ( 2- 3)( 3- 2) | Chapin | |
| Christ Church Episco | Christ Church Episco | Christ Church Episco | ||
| Clover | Clover | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) | Clover | |
| Dorman | Dorman | Dorman | ||
| Dutch Fork | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | ||
| Eastside | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | ||
| Fort Mill | Fort Mill | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) | Fort Mill | |
| Fox Creek | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | ||
| Gilbert | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | ||
| Greenville | Greenville | Greenville | ||
| Hammond School | JL Mann Academy | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | JL Mann Academy | |
| Heathwood Hall | JL Mann Academy | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | JL Mann Academy | |
| Hillcrest | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | ||
| Hilton Head | Hilton Head | Hilton Head | ||
| Hilton Head Christia | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | ||
| James Island Charter | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | ||
| Laurence Manning Aca | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | ||
| Legion Collegiate Ac | Legion Collegiate Ac | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Legion Collegiate Ac | |
| Lexington | JL Mann Academy | tied - ( 1- 3) ( 1- 3) | JL Mann Academy | |
| Lucy Beckham | Lucy Beckham | Lucy Beckham 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Mauldin | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| May River | May River | May River | ||
| Myrtle Beach | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | ||
| Nation Ford | Nation Ford | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Nation Ford | |
| North Myrtle Beach | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | ||
| Oceanside Academy | Oceanside Academy | Oceanside Academy 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Philip Simmons | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | ||
| Porter-Gaud | Porter-Gaud | Porter-Gaud | ||
| River Bluff | JL Mann Academy | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | JL Mann Academy | |
| Riverside | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy 4- 4 vs 2- 6 | ||
| Socastee | JL Mann Academy | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | JL Mann Academy | |
| Spartanburg | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | ||
| Spring Valley | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| St James | JL Mann Academy | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | JL Mann Academy | |
| St Joseph Catholic | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy 4- 1 vs 0- 5 | ||
| TL Hanna | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | ||
| Trinity Collegiate | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | ||
| Waccamaw | JL Mann Academy | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | JL Mann Academy | |
| Wade Hampton | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy 5- 2 vs 0- 7 | ||
| Wando | Wando | Wando 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Westside | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| White Knoll | JL Mann Academy | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | JL Mann Academy | |
| Woodmont | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy |
PowerWise = 38
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.54
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Boiling Spring (13- 4, 95.3) 5-16 -4.56 22.04 -0.33 1.13 -5.52
0 A Dutch Fork ( 4-11, 85.3) 10- 4 -14.59 12.01 0.33 1.13 13.94
0 A TL Hanna ( 7- 8, 84.8) 18- 3 -15.09 11.51 0.33 1.13 13.37
0 A Dorman (15- 4, 93.3) 12-17 -6.64 19.97 0.33 1.13 -7.11
0 H Woodmont ( 4- 8, 80.1) 19- 2 -19.84 6.76 -0.33 1.13 7.25
0 H Hillcrest ( 4- 5, 83.3) 18- 4 -16.59 10.01 -0.33 1.13 10.92
0 A Eastside ( 9- 8, 90.5) 15- 5 -9.37 17.24 0.33 1.13 19.83
0 H Spartanburg ( 8- 8, 89.7) 14- 7 -10.20 16.40 -0.33 1.13 18.14
0 H Christ Church (10- 7, 93.1) 5-10 -6.83 19.77 -0.33 1.13 -8.09
0 A Greenville ( 9- 4, 91.7) 8- 9 -8.19 18.41 0.33 1.13 -8.87
0 A Mauldin (13- 4, 93.2) 6-10 -6.74 19.87 0.33 1.13 -7.23
0 A Dorman (15- 4, 93.3) 8-11 -6.64 19.97 0.33 1.13 -7.11
------
39.52
|
winning pts = 83.4505 losing points = -43.9304
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------