Idaho Falls
W-L: ( 5- 7) PR = 86.5572Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 402 H Pocatello ( 5- 7, 86.6) 6-10 412 A Sandpoint ( 8-10, 86.3) 8- 6 412 A Lake City (11- 7, 88.8) 3-11 415 H Ammon (13- 3, 91.2) 2-16 421 A Teton Valley ( 4-12, 85.5) 11- 5 426 A Sun Valley ( 9- 5, 87.8) 7-13 426 A Pocatello ( 5- 7, 86.6) 11- 5 503 H Magic Valley ( 0-10, 84.7) 1- 0 503 H Jackson Hole (11- 4, 92.1) 3-13 505 H Teton Valley ( 4-12, 85.5) 13-10 507 A Ammon (13- 3, 91.2) 0- 1 510 H Teton Valley ( 4-12, 85.5) 5- 6
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
402 H Pocatello 6-10 -4 0 -- -4.06
412 A Sandpoint 8- 6 2 0 1.91
412 A Lake City 3-11 -8 -2 - -2.64
415 H Ammon 2-16 -14 -5 -0.49
421 A Teton Valley 11- 5 6 1 ++ 4.07
426 A Sun Valley 7-13 -6 -1 - -3.63
426 A Pocatello 11- 5 6 0 ++ 5.20
503 H Jackson Hole 3-13 -10 -5 0.00
505 H Teton Valley 13-10 3 1 1.82
510 H Teton Valley 5- 6 -1 1 - -2.18
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 402 H Pocatello 6-10 -4 0 -- -4.06 412 A Lake City 3-11 -8 -2 - -2.64 426 A Sun Valley 7-13 -6 -1 - -3.63 510 H Teton Valley 5- 6 -1 1 - -2.18 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 421 A Teton Valley 11- 5 6 1 ++ 4.07 426 A Pocatello 11- 5 6 0 ++ 5.20 |
Idaho Falls Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ammon | Ammon | Ammon | ||
| Bishop Kelly | Bishop Kelly | Bishop Kelly | ||
| Boise | Boise | Boise | ||
| Borah/Capital | Idaho Falls | Idaho Falls | ||
| Centennial | Idaho Falls | Idaho Falls | ||
| Chesterton of Notre | Idaho Falls | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Idaho Falls | |
| Coeur d'Alene | Coeur d'Alene | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Coeur d'Alene | |
| Eagle | Eagle | Eagle | ||
| Emmett | Idaho Falls | Idaho Falls | ||
| Immaculate Conceptio | Idaho Falls | Idaho Falls 2- 3 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Jackson Hole | Jackson Hole | Jackson Hole | ||
| Kuna | Idaho Falls | Idaho Falls | ||
| Lake City | Lake City | Lake City | ||
| Logos | Idaho Falls | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Idaho Falls | |
| Magic Valley | Idaho Falls | Idaho Falls | ||
| Meridian | Idaho Falls | Idaho Falls | ||
| Middleton | Idaho Falls | Idaho Falls | ||
| Mountain View | Mountain View | Mountain View | ||
| Owyhee | Idaho Falls | Idaho Falls | ||
| Pocatello | Pocatello | tied - ( 2- 5) ( 2- 4) | Pocatello | |
| Rocky Mountain | Rocky Mountain | Rocky Mountain | ||
| Sandpoint | Idaho Falls | Idaho Falls | ||
| Spokane | Spokane | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Spokane | |
| Spokane Valley | Spokane Valley | Spokane Valley 4- 1 vs 2- 4 | ||
| Sun Valley | Sun Valley | Sun Valley | ||
| Teton Valley | Idaho Falls | Idaho Falls | ||
| Timberline | Timberline | Timberline | ||
| Vallivue | Idaho Falls | Idaho Falls | ||
| Gonzaga Prep | Gonzaga Prep | tied - ( 2- 4) ( 2- 2) | Gonzaga Prep | |
| Lewis & Clark | Lewis & Clark | Lewis & Clark | ||
| Mead | Mead | Mead 4- 2 vs 2- 5 | ||
| Mount Spokane | Mount Spokane | Mount Spokane 4- 0 vs 2- 3 |
PowerWise = 14
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.45
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Pocatello ( 5- 7, 86.6) 6-10 -13.27 8.39 -0.13 1.12 -15.02
0 A Sandpoint ( 8-10, 86.3) 8- 6 -13.56 8.10 0.13 1.12 9.22
0 A Lake City (11- 7, 88.8) 3-11 -11.11 10.55 0.13 1.12 -12.31
0 H Ammon (13- 3, 91.2) 2-16 -8.71 12.96 -0.13 1.12 -9.90
0 A Teton Valley ( 4-12, 85.5) 11- 5 -14.40 7.27 0.13 1.12 8.29
0 A Sun Valley ( 9- 5, 87.8) 7-13 -12.10 9.56 0.13 1.12 -13.42
0 A Pocatello ( 5- 7, 86.6) 11- 5 -13.27 8.39 0.13 1.12 9.55
0 H Magic Valley ( 0-10, 84.7) 1- 0 -15.22 6.44 -0.13 1.12 7.08
0 H Jackson Hole (11- 4, 92.1) 3-13 -7.83 13.83 -0.13 1.12 -8.92
0 H Teton Valley ( 4-12, 85.5) 13-10 -14.40 7.27 -0.13 1.12 8.01
0 A Ammon (13- 3, 91.2) 0- 1 -8.71 12.96 0.13 1.12 -9.62
0 H Teton Valley ( 4-12, 85.5) 5- 6 -14.40 7.27 -0.13 1.12 -16.28
------
-43.34
|
winning pts = 42.1563 losing points = -85.4920
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------