---    UPDATED: 07-28-25 23:50 PDT

safe3step boys Haddam-Killingworth 1
  
Haddam-Killingworth   
W-L: (19- 2) PR = 86.1623

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 410 A Old Saybrook (15- 5, 83.4) 8-20 417 A Cromwell ( 1-15, 63.5) 18- 0 422 A Valley Regional (10- 9, 79.3) 17- 9 424 A Old Lyme ( 4-12, 74.7) 13- 1 426 H North Haven ( 5-11, 77.1) 17- 1 429 H Old Saybrook (15- 5, 83.4) 14- 4 501 A Morgan School ( 8-10, 78.1) 15- 4 506 A North Branford (11- 8, 81.5) 7- 5 508 H Valley Regional (10- 9, 79.3) 19- 7 510 A EO Smith ( 8- 9, 76.6) 19- 5 513 A Newington ( 5-12, 79.9) 12- 5 515 H Old Lyme ( 4-12, 74.7) 24- 0 517 H Stonington ( 7- 9, 77.5) 18- 4 519 H Morgan School ( 8-10, 78.1) 17- 1 520 A Cromwell ( 1-15, 63.5) 25- 0 521 H North Branford (11- 8, 81.5) 14- 5 527 H Valley Regional (10- 9, 79.3) 17- 3 529 N Old Saybrook (15- 5, 83.4) 11- 5 604 H Lewis Mills ( 8- 9, 79.5) 22- 4 607 H Weston ( 9-10, 83.9) 15- 7 610 N New Fairfield (20- 2, 90.5) 4- 5

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   410 A Old Saybrook            8-20     -12     2    ---   -7.33
   417 A Cromwell               18- 0      18    22           0.00
   422 A Valley Regional        17- 9       8     6           0.00
   424 A Old Lyme               13- 1      12    11           0.00
   426 H North Haven            17- 1      16    10           0.00
   429 H Old Saybrook           14- 4      10     3           1.72
   501 A Morgan School          15- 4      11     8           0.00
   506 A North Branford          7- 5       2     4    -     -2.23
   508 H Valley Regional        19- 7      12     7           0.00
   510 A EO Smith               19- 5      14     9           0.00
   513 A Newington              12- 5       7     6           0.00
   515 H Old Lyme               24- 0      24    12           0.00
   517 H Stonington             18- 4      14     9           0.00
   519 H Morgan School          17- 1      16     9           0.00
   520 A Cromwell               25- 0      25    22           0.00
   521 H North Branford         14- 5       9     5           0.00
   527 H Valley Regional        17- 3      14     7           0.00
   529 N Old Saybrook           11- 5       6     3    +      2.19
   604 H Lewis Mills            22- 4      18     7           0.00
   607 H Weston                 15- 7       8     3    +      2.29
   610 N New Fairfield           4- 5      -1    -4    +      3.36

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   410 A Old Saybrook            8-20     -12     2    ---   -7.33
   506 A North Branford          7- 5       2     4    -     -2.23

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   529 N Old Saybrook           11- 5       6     3    +      2.19
   607 H Weston                 15- 7       8     3    +      2.29
   610 N New Fairfield           4- 5      -1    -4    +      3.36

Haddam-Killingworth Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Amity Regional Haddam-Killingworth   Haddam-Killingworth
Avon HS Haddam-Killingworth insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Haddam-Killingworth
Bacon Academy Haddam-Killingworth insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) Haddam-Killingworth
Berlin Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Bethel Haddam-Killingworth insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 2) Haddam-Killingworth
Branford Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth   5- 1 vs 2- 3
Brien McMahon Haddam-Killingworth   Haddam-Killingworth
Bristol Co-Op Haddam-Killingworth tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Haddam-Killingworth
Brookfield Haddam-Killingworth insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 2) Haddam-Killingworth
Bunnell-Stratford Haddam-Killingworth insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 2) Haddam-Killingworth
Canton Haddam-Killingworth insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 1) Haddam-Killingworth
Capital-Classical Pr Haddam-Killingworth   Haddam-Killingworth
Cheshire HS Cheshire HS   Cheshire HS
Conard Conard   Conard
Cromwell Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth  
Danbury Haddam-Killingworth   Haddam-Killingworth
Daniel Hand Daniel Hand tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 1) Daniel Hand
Darien Darien   Darien
East Catholic Haddam-Killingworth tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Haddam-Killingworth
East Lyme Haddam-Killingworth tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Haddam-Killingworth
Ellington Haddam-Killingworth insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Haddam-Killingworth
Enfield Haddam-Killingworth tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Haddam-Killingworth
EO Smith Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth  
Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Fairfield Prep Fairfield Prep   Fairfield Prep
Fairfield Warde Haddam-Killingworth   Haddam-Killingworth
Farmington Haddam-Killingworth insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) Haddam-Killingworth
Fitch Groton Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth   3- 1 vs 1- 2
Foran Haddam-Killingworth tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Haddam-Killingworth
Glastonbury Glastonbury   Glastonbury
Granby Memorial Haddam-Killingworth tied - ( 0- 0) ( 0- 1) Haddam-Killingworth
Greenwich HS Greenwich HS tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Greenwich HS
Guilford Guilford tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Guilford
Hall Haddam-Killingworth tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Haddam-Killingworth
Hamden Haddam-Killingworth tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Haddam-Killingworth
Holy Cross Haddam-Killingworth   Haddam-Killingworth
Immaculate Danbury Haddam-Killingworth insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 2) Haddam-Killingworth
Joel Barlow Joel Barlow insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 2- 0) Joel Barlow
Jonathan Law Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Lakeview United Haddam-Killingworth   Haddam-Killingworth
Ledyard-Griswold Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth   2- 1 vs 0- 2
Lewis Mills Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth  
Lyman Hall Haddam-Killingworth tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Haddam-Killingworth
Maloney-Platt Haddam-Killingworth insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Haddam-Killingworth
Masuk Haddam-Killingworth insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 2) Haddam-Killingworth
Middletown Haddam-Killingworth insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Haddam-Killingworth
Montville Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Morgan School Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth  
New Canaan New Canaan   New Canaan
New Fairfield New Fairfield New Fairfield  
New Milford Haddam-Killingworth insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 2) Haddam-Killingworth
Newington Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth  
Newtown Haddam-Killingworth tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 1) Haddam-Killingworth
North Branford Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth  
North Haven Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth  
Northwest Catholic Haddam-Killingworth tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Haddam-Killingworth
Norwalk Haddam-Killingworth   Haddam-Killingworth
Norwich Free Academy Haddam-Killingworth insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Haddam-Killingworth
Norwich Tech Haddam-Killingworth insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Haddam-Killingworth
Notre Dame-Fairfield Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth   2- 0 vs 0- 3
Notre Dame-West Have Notre Dame-West Have tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Notre Dame-West Have
Old Lyme Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth  
Old Saybrook Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth  
Pomperaug Haddam-Killingworth insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 2) Haddam-Killingworth
Prince-Cheney Tech Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth   2- 0 vs 0- 2
RHAM Haddam-Killingworth tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) Haddam-Killingworth
Ridgefield Ridgefield   Ridgefield
Rockville Co-op Haddam-Killingworth   Haddam-Killingworth
Rocky Hill Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Sheehan Haddam-Killingworth tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) Haddam-Killingworth
Shelton Haddam-Killingworth insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Haddam-Killingworth
Simsbury Haddam-Killingworth tied - ( 0- 0) ( 0- 1) Haddam-Killingworth
Somers Somers tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 0) Somers
South Windsor Haddam-Killingworth insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) Haddam-Killingworth
Southington Southington tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Southington
St Bernard-Wheeler Haddam-Killingworth tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 0) Haddam-Killingworth
St Joseph Trumbull St Joseph Trumbull tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) St Joseph Trumbull
St Paul Catholic Haddam-Killingworth insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Haddam-Killingworth
Stamford Haddam-Killingworth   Haddam-Killingworth
Staples Staples insuffient: ( 0- 0)( 1- 0) Staples
Stonington Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth  
Suffield Haddam-Killingworth tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Haddam-Killingworth
Tolland Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth   4- 0 vs 1- 3
Trumbull Trumbull tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 1) Trumbull
Valley Regional Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth  
Vinal/Goodwin Tech Haddam-Killingworth tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Haddam-Killingworth
Waterford Haddam-Killingworth insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) Haddam-Killingworth
Watertown Haddam-Killingworth insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Haddam-Killingworth
West Haven Haddam-Killingworth insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Haddam-Killingworth
Westhill Haddam-Killingworth   Haddam-Killingworth
Weston Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth  
Wethersfield Haddam-Killingworth tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Haddam-Killingworth
Wilbur Cross Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Wilton Wilton   Wilton
Windsor Haddam-Killingworth insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Haddam-Killingworth
Wolcott Haddam-Killingworth   Haddam-Killingworth
Woodstock Academy Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Xavier Haddam-Killingworth tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Haddam-Killingworth

PowerWise = 78


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 17.01

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Old Saybrook    (15- 5, 83.4)     8-20      -16.54      23.71       0.47         0.81           -13.02
   0 A Cromwell        ( 1-15, 63.5)    18- 0      -36.37       3.88       0.47         0.81             3.53
   0 A Valley Regiona  (10- 9, 79.3)    17- 9      -20.55      19.70       0.47         0.81            16.34
   0 A Old Lyme        ( 4-12, 74.7)    13- 1      -25.18      15.07       0.47         0.81            12.59
   0 H North Haven     ( 5-11, 77.1)    17- 1      -22.82      17.43      -0.47         0.81            13.74
   0 H Old Saybrook    (15- 5, 83.4)    14- 4      -16.54      23.71      -0.47         0.81            18.82
   0 A Morgan School   ( 8-10, 78.1)    15- 4      -21.77      18.48       0.47         0.81            15.35
   0 A North Branford  (11- 8, 81.5)     7- 5      -18.44      21.81       0.47         0.81            18.05
   0 H Valley Regiona  (10- 9, 79.3)    19- 7      -20.55      19.70      -0.47         0.81            15.58
   0 A EO Smith        ( 8- 9, 76.6)    19- 5      -23.30      16.96       0.47         0.81            14.12
   0 A Newington       ( 5-12, 79.9)    12- 5      -20.03      20.22       0.47         0.81            16.76
   0 H Old Lyme        ( 4-12, 74.7)    24- 0      -25.18      15.07      -0.47         0.81            11.82
   0 H Stonington      ( 7- 9, 77.5)    18- 4      -22.45      17.81      -0.47         0.81            14.04
   0 H Morgan School   ( 8-10, 78.1)    17- 1      -21.77      18.48      -0.47         0.81            14.59
   0 A Cromwell        ( 1-15, 63.5)    25- 0      -36.37       3.88       0.47         0.81             3.53
   0 H North Branford  (11- 8, 81.5)    14- 5      -18.44      21.81      -0.47         0.81            17.28
   0 H Valley Regiona  (10- 9, 79.3)    17- 3      -20.55      19.70      -0.47         0.81            15.58
   0 N Old Saybrook    (15- 5, 83.4)    11- 5      -16.54      23.71      -0.00         0.81            19.21
   0 H Lewis Mills     ( 8- 9, 79.5)    22- 4      -20.38      19.88      -0.47         0.81            15.72
   0 H Weston          ( 9-10, 83.9)    15- 7      -15.97      24.29      -0.47         0.81            19.29
   0 N New Fairfield   (20- 2, 90.5)     4- 5       -9.38      30.87      -0.00         0.81            -7.60
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       255.32

winning pts = 275.9414 losing points = -20.6174

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------