Grand Cities LC
W-L: ( 3- 4) PR = 95.4945Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 511 H Red River Valley LC ( 9- 0, 99.9) 2-13 511 H Watertown LC ( 1- 6, 92.9) 10- 5 531 N Red River Valley LC ( 9- 0, 99.9) 2-10 531 N Bismarck-Mandan LC ( 6- 4, 95.0) 8- 9 531 N Black Hills LC ( 1- 6, 90.9) 21- 5 607 N Bismarck-Mandan LC ( 6- 4, 95.0) 7- 6 608 A Red River Valley LC ( 9- 0, 99.9) 2- 7
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
511 H Red River Valley LC 2-13 -11 -4 -0.60
511 H Watertown LC 10- 5 5 3 + 2.38
531 N Red River Valley LC 2-10 -8 -4 -0.59
531 N Bismarck-Mandan LC 8- 9 -1 0 -1.49
531 N Black Hills LC 21- 5 16 5 0.38
607 N Bismarck-Mandan LC 7- 6 1 0 0.51
608 A Red River Valley LC 2- 7 -5 -4 -0.58
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 511 H Watertown LC 10- 5 5 3 + 2.38 |
Grand Cities LC Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bismarck-Mandan LC | Grand Cities LC | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) | Grand Cities LC | |
| Black Hills LC | Grand Cities LC | Grand Cities LC | ||
| Red River Valley LC | Red River Valley LC | Red River Valley LC | ||
| Watertown LC | Grand Cities LC | Grand Cities LC |
PowerWise = 3
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 8.00
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Red River Vall ( 9- 0, 99.9) 2-13 -0.00 9.02 -0.01 1.14 -0.01
0 H Watertown LC ( 1- 6, 92.9) 10- 5 -7.02 2.00 -0.01 1.14 2.28
0 N Red River Vall ( 9- 0, 99.9) 2-10 -0.00 9.02 -0.00 1.14 -0.00
0 N Bismarck-Manda ( 6- 4, 95.0) 8- 9 -4.89 4.13 -0.00 1.14 -5.59
0 N Black Hills LC ( 1- 6, 90.9) 21- 5 -9.02 1.00 -0.00 1.14 1.14
0 N Bismarck-Manda ( 6- 4, 95.0) 7- 6 -4.89 4.13 -0.00 1.14 4.72
0 A Red River Vall ( 9- 0, 99.9) 2- 7 -0.00 9.02 0.01 1.14 -0.01
------
2.53
|
winning pts = 8.1452 losing points = -5.6139
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------