Farmington
W-L: (14- 1) PR = 97.8580Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 411 H Chisago Lakes ( 7- 8, 90.6) 12- 2 418 H Rochester United ( 4-11, 87.5) 11- 2 422 A Eastview/Apple Valle ( 3-12, 90.8) 10- 7 424 H Northfield ( 8- 6, 89.9) 13- 2 430 A Shakopee ( 6- 8, 92.1) 20- 6 502 A Centennial (10- 4, 93.3) 14- 4 506 H Lakeville North (14- 5, 97.3) 10- 3 508 A Eagan ( 2-13, 87.7) 18- 1 510 A Owatonna ( 6- 8, 90.0) 15- 4 513 H Prior Lake ( 8- 6, 95.8) 11- 5 516 H Rosemount (11- 4, 96.0) 10- 7 520 A Lakeville South ( 8- 7, 93.3) 7- 5 528 H Rochester United ( 4-11, 87.5) 15- 3 530 H Lakeville South ( 8- 7, 93.3) 12- 6 603 H Lakeville North (14- 5, 97.3) 8- 9
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
411 H Chisago Lakes 12- 2 10 8 0.00
418 H Rochester United 11- 2 9 11 0.00
422 A Eastview/Apple Valle 10- 7 3 6 - -2.00
424 H Northfield 13- 2 11 9 0.00
430 A Shakopee 20- 6 14 5 0.00
502 A Centennial 14- 4 10 4 1.20
506 H Lakeville North 10- 3 7 1 + 3.67
508 A Eagan 18- 1 17 9 0.00
510 A Owatonna 15- 4 11 7 0.00
513 H Prior Lake 11- 5 6 3 + 2.20
516 H Rosemount 10- 7 3 3 0.41
520 A Lakeville South 7- 5 2 4 -1.86
528 H Rochester United 15- 3 12 11 0.00
530 H Lakeville South 12- 6 6 5 0.00
603 H Lakeville North 8- 9 -1 1 - -2.33
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 422 A Eastview/Apple Valle 10- 7 3 6 - -2.00 603 H Lakeville North 8- 9 -1 1 - -2.33 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 506 H Lakeville North 10- 3 7 1 + 3.67 513 H Prior Lake 11- 5 6 3 + 2.20 |
Farmington Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andover | Farmington | tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) | Farmington | |
| Anoka | Farmington | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Farmington | |
| Becker | Farmington | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Farmington | |
| Benilde-St Margarets | Farmington | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 0) | Farmington | |
| Big Lake/Princeton | Farmington | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Farmington | |
| Blaine | Farmington | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Farmington | |
| Blake School | Farmington | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Farmington | |
| Bloomington Jefferso | Farmington | insuffient: ( 4- 0)( 3- 1) | Farmington | |
| Bloomington Kennedy/ | Farmington | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Farmington | |
| Brainerd | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Breck School | Farmington | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Farmington | |
| Buffalo | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Centennial | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Champlin Park | Farmington | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Farmington | |
| Chanhassen | Farmington | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Farmington | |
| Chaska | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Chisago Lakes | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Cloquet/Esko/Carlton | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Cretin-Derham Hall | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Delano/Rockford | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Duluth East/Denfield | Farmington | Farmington 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Duluth Marshall | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Eagan | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| East Ridge | Farmington | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 0) | Farmington | |
| Eastview/Apple Valle | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Eden Prairie | Farmington | tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) | Farmington | |
| Edina | Edina | insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 2- 1) | Edina | |
| Elk River/Zimmerman | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Forest Lake | Farmington | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Farmington | |
| Grand Rapids/Greenwa | Farmington | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Farmington | |
| Hastings | Farmington | insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) | Farmington | |
| Hermantown/Proctor | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Hill-Murray | Farmington | tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) | Farmington | |
| Holy Angels | Farmington | Farmington 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Holy Family Catholic | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Hopkins/St Louis Par | Farmington | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Farmington | |
| Hutchinson | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Irondale | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Lakeville North | Farmington | insuffient: ( 8- 0)( 7- 1) | Farmington | |
| Lakeville South | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Mahtomedi | Farmington | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Farmington | |
| Mankato United | Farmington | Farmington 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Maple Grove | Farmington | Farmington 2- 1 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Minneapolis United | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Minnetonka | Farmington | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 1) | Farmington | |
| Monticello | Farmington | Farmington 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Moorhead | Farmington | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Farmington | |
| Mound Westonka | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Mounds View | Farmington | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Farmington | |
| New Prague | Farmington | Farmington 6- 1 vs 4- 2 | ||
| Northfield | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Orono | Farmington | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Farmington | |
| Osseo/Park Center | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Owatonna | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Park Cottage Grove | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Prior Lake | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Providence Academy | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Robbinsdale Armstron | Farmington | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Farmington | |
| Rochester United | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Rocori | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Rogers | Farmington | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Farmington | |
| Rosemount | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Roseville | Farmington | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Farmington | |
| Sartell/Sauk Rapids | Farmington | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Farmington | |
| Shakopee | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Simley | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Southwest Christian | Farmington | Farmington 3- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Spring Lake Park/Coo | Farmington | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Farmington | |
| St Cloud Unified | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| St Michael-Albertvil | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| St Paul/Two Rivers | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| St Thomas Academy | Farmington | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Farmington | |
| Stillwater | Stillwater | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Stillwater | |
| Totino Grace | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| TriMAC Academy | Farmington | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Farmington | |
| Waconia | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Wayzata | Farmington | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Farmington | |
| White Bear Lake | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Woodbury | Farmington | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Farmington |
PowerWise = 77
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 14.62
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Chisago Lakes ( 7- 8, 90.6) 12- 2 -9.35 15.72 -0.74 0.98 14.61
0 H Rochester Unit ( 4-11, 87.5) 11- 2 -12.41 12.66 -0.74 0.98 11.62
0 A Eastview/Apple ( 3-12, 90.8) 10- 7 -9.08 15.99 0.74 0.98 16.31
0 H Northfield ( 8- 6, 89.9) 13- 2 -9.99 15.08 -0.74 0.98 13.98
0 A Shakopee ( 6- 8, 92.1) 20- 6 -7.82 17.24 0.74 0.98 17.54
0 A Centennial (10- 4, 93.3) 14- 4 -6.58 18.49 0.74 0.98 18.75
0 H Lakeville Nort (14- 5, 97.3) 10- 3 -2.63 22.44 -0.74 0.98 21.15
0 A Eagan ( 2-13, 87.7) 18- 1 -12.16 12.91 0.74 0.98 13.30
0 A Owatonna ( 6- 8, 90.0) 15- 4 -9.87 15.20 0.74 0.98 15.54
0 H Prior Lake ( 8- 6, 95.8) 11- 5 -4.10 20.96 -0.74 0.98 19.72
0 H Rosemount (11- 4, 96.0) 10- 7 -3.89 21.18 -0.74 0.98 19.93
0 A Lakeville Sout ( 8- 7, 93.3) 7- 5 -6.64 18.42 0.74 0.98 18.69
0 H Rochester Unit ( 4-11, 87.5) 15- 3 -12.41 12.66 -0.74 0.98 11.62
0 H Lakeville Sout ( 8- 7, 93.3) 12- 6 -6.64 18.42 -0.74 0.98 17.24
0 H Lakeville Nort (14- 5, 97.3) 8- 9 -2.63 22.44 -0.74 0.98 -3.29
------
226.71
|
winning pts = 229.9983 losing points = -3.2871
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------