---    UPDATED: 07-28-25 23:50 PDT

safe3step boys Fairfield Ludlowe 1
  
Fairfield Ludlowe     
W-L: (15- 5) PR = 94.5074

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 412 H St Joseph Trumbull (14- 5, 95.2) 6- 3 414 A Brookfield (12- 8, 84.9) 17- 3 415 A Ridgefield (10- 3, 99.3) 3-11 419 A Daniel Hand (13- 8, 89.0) 12- 5 422 A Brien McMahon ( 5-11, 79.4) 17- 2 424 H Trumbull ( 9- 8, 87.7) 14- 1 426 H Southington (11- 7, 88.1) 12- 5 429 H Wilton ( 3-10, 95.0) 8- 7 501 A Norwalk ( 1-15, 69.9) 18- 3 503 A Greenwich HS (11- 5, 95.8) 8- 9 506 H Staples (13- 3, 99.4) 6-15 510 A Fairfield Warde ( 6-10, 80.0) 17- 5 515 A Danbury ( 2-13, 69.9) 21- 1 517 H Stamford ( 7- 9, 83.1) 12- 3 519 H Westhill ( 3-11, 73.5) 16- 0 523 A Staples (13- 3, 99.4) 2-16 604 H Windsor ( 7-10, 67.5) 20- 1 607 H Newtown (13- 7, 85.1) 19- 5 611 N Conard (16- 5, 89.6) 17- 7 614 N St Joseph Trumbull (14- 5, 95.2) 5-10

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   412 H St Joseph Trumbull      6- 3       3     0    +      3.25
   414 A Brookfield             17- 3      14     9           0.00
   415 A Ridgefield              3-11      -8    -5           0.00
   419 A Daniel Hand            12- 5       7     5           0.00
   422 A Brien McMahon          17- 2      15    15           0.00
   424 H Trumbull               14- 1      13     7           0.00
   426 H Southington            12- 5       7     7           0.00
   429 H Wilton                  8- 7       1     0           1.04
   501 A Norwalk                18- 3      15    24           0.00
   503 A Greenwich HS            8- 9      -1    -2           0.75
   506 H Staples                 6-15      -9    -4          -0.62
   510 A Fairfield Warde        17- 5      12    14           0.00
   515 A Danbury                21- 1      20    24           0.00
   517 H Stamford               12- 3       9    12           0.00
   519 H Westhill               16- 0      16    21           0.00
   523 A Staples                 2-16     -14    -5           0.00
   604 H Windsor                20- 1      19    27           0.00
   607 H Newtown                19- 5      14    10           0.00
   611 N Conard                 17- 7      10     5           0.13
   614 N St Joseph Trumbull      5-10      -5    -1    --    -4.28

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   614 N St Joseph Trumbull      5-10      -5    -1    --    -4.28

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   412 H St Joseph Trumbull      6- 3       3     0    +      3.25

Fairfield Ludlowe Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Amity Regional Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Avon HS Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Bacon Academy Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Berlin Fairfield Ludlowe insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Fairfield Ludlowe
Bethel Fairfield Ludlowe insuffient: ( 5- 0)( 4- 1) Fairfield Ludlowe
Branford Fairfield Ludlowe tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Fairfield Ludlowe
Brien McMahon Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe  
Bristol Co-Op Fairfield Ludlowe tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Fairfield Ludlowe
Brookfield Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe  
Bunnell-Stratford Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe   5- 0 vs 2- 3
Canton Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Capital-Classical Pr Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Cheshire HS Fairfield Ludlowe tied - ( 3- 2) ( 3- 1) Fairfield Ludlowe
Conard Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe  
Cromwell Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Danbury Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe  
Daniel Hand Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe  
Darien Darien Darien   6- 1 vs 4- 3
East Catholic Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe   2- 0 vs 0- 2
East Lyme Fairfield Ludlowe insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Fairfield Ludlowe
Ellington Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Enfield Fairfield Ludlowe insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 1) Fairfield Ludlowe
EO Smith Fairfield Ludlowe insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Fairfield Ludlowe
Fairfield Prep Fairfield Prep tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Fairfield Prep
Fairfield Warde Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe  
Farmington Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Fitch Groton Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Foran Fairfield Ludlowe insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Fairfield Ludlowe
Glastonbury Glastonbury tied - ( 4- 1) ( 4- 1) Glastonbury
Granby Memorial Fairfield Ludlowe insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Fairfield Ludlowe
Greenwich HS Greenwich HS Greenwich HS  
Guilford Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Haddam-Killingworth Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Hall Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Hamden Fairfield Ludlowe tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Fairfield Ludlowe
Holy Cross Fairfield Ludlowe insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Fairfield Ludlowe
Immaculate Danbury Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Joel Barlow Fairfield Ludlowe tied - ( 3- 1) ( 3- 1) Fairfield Ludlowe
Jonathan Law Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Lakeview United Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Ledyard-Griswold Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Lewis Mills Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Lyman Hall Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Maloney-Platt Fairfield Ludlowe insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Fairfield Ludlowe
Masuk Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Middletown Fairfield Ludlowe insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Fairfield Ludlowe
Montville Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Morgan School Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
New Canaan New Canaan New Canaan   6- 1 vs 4- 4
New Fairfield Fairfield Ludlowe tied - ( 4- 1) ( 4- 1) Fairfield Ludlowe
New Milford Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe   4- 1 vs 1- 3
Newington Fairfield Ludlowe insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Fairfield Ludlowe
Newtown Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe  
North Branford Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
North Haven Fairfield Ludlowe insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Fairfield Ludlowe
Northwest Catholic Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Norwalk Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe  
Norwich Free Academy Fairfield Ludlowe insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) Fairfield Ludlowe
Norwich Tech Fairfield Ludlowe insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Fairfield Ludlowe
Notre Dame-Fairfield Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Notre Dame-West Have Fairfield Ludlowe insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 2- 2) Fairfield Ludlowe
Old Lyme Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Old Saybrook Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Pomperaug Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Prince-Cheney Tech Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe   2- 0 vs 0- 2
RHAM Fairfield Ludlowe insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Fairfield Ludlowe
Ridgefield Ridgefield Ridgefield  
Rockville Co-op Fairfield Ludlowe tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Fairfield Ludlowe
Rocky Hill Fairfield Ludlowe tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Fairfield Ludlowe
Sheehan Fairfield Ludlowe tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Fairfield Ludlowe
Shelton Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe   4- 0 vs 2- 2
Simsbury Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe   3- 1 vs 0- 3
Somers Fairfield Ludlowe insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Fairfield Ludlowe
South Windsor Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Southington Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe  
St Bernard-Wheeler Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
St Joseph Trumbull St Joseph Trumbull tied - ( 8- 2) ( 8- 2) St Joseph Trumbull
St Paul Catholic Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Stamford Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe  
Staples Staples Staples  
Stonington Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Suffield Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Tolland Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Trumbull Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe  
Valley Regional Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Vinal/Goodwin Tech Fairfield Ludlowe insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Fairfield Ludlowe
Waterford Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Watertown Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
West Haven Fairfield Ludlowe tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Fairfield Ludlowe
Westhill Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe  
Weston Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe   5- 2 vs 1- 5
Wethersfield Fairfield Ludlowe insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Fairfield Ludlowe
Wilbur Cross Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Wilton Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe  
Windsor Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe  
Wolcott Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Woodstock Academy Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Xavier Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe   3- 0 vs 0- 3

PowerWise = 90


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 17.01

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H St Joseph Trum  (14- 5, 95.2)     6- 3       -4.67      35.58      -0.47         0.85            29.86
   0 A Brookfield      (12- 8, 84.9)    17- 3      -14.98      25.27       0.47         0.85            21.90
   0 A Ridgefield      (10- 3, 99.3)     3-11       -0.57      39.68       0.47         0.85            -0.09
   0 A Daniel Hand     (13- 8, 89.0)    12- 5      -10.94      29.31       0.47         0.85            25.33
   0 A Brien McMahon   ( 5-11, 79.4)    17- 2      -20.46      19.80       0.47         0.85            17.24
   0 H Trumbull        ( 9- 8, 87.7)    14- 1      -12.24      28.02      -0.47         0.85            23.43
   0 H Southington     (11- 7, 88.1)    12- 5      -11.84      28.41      -0.47         0.85            23.76
   0 H Wilton          ( 3-10, 95.0)     8- 7       -4.88      35.37      -0.47         0.85            29.68
   0 A Norwalk         ( 1-15, 69.9)    18- 3      -30.00      10.25       0.47         0.85             9.12
   0 A Greenwich HS    (11- 5, 95.8)     8- 9       -4.12      36.14       0.47         0.85            -3.10
   0 H Staples         (13- 3, 99.4)     6-15       -0.54      39.72      -0.47         0.85            -0.86
   0 A Fairfield Ward  ( 6-10, 80.0)    17- 5      -19.95      20.31       0.47         0.85            17.67
   0 A Danbury         ( 2-13, 69.9)    21- 1      -29.96      10.29       0.47         0.85             9.16
   0 H Stamford        ( 7- 9, 83.1)    12- 3      -16.81      23.44      -0.47         0.85            19.54
   0 H Westhill        ( 3-11, 73.5)    16- 0      -26.36      13.89      -0.47         0.85            11.41
   0 A Staples         (13- 3, 99.4)     2-16       -0.54      39.72       0.47         0.85            -0.06
   0 H Windsor         ( 7-10, 67.5)    20- 1      -32.40       7.85      -0.47         0.85             6.27
   0 H Newtown         (13- 7, 85.1)    19- 5      -14.78      25.47      -0.47         0.85            21.26
   0 N Conard          (16- 5, 89.6)    17- 7      -10.26      30.00      -0.00         0.85            25.51
   0 N St Joseph Trum  (14- 5, 95.2)     5-10       -4.67      35.58      -0.00         0.85            -3.97
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       283.08

winning pts = 291.1547 losing points = -8.0717

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------