Exeter HS
W-L: (11- 6) PR = 94.2686Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 414 A Windham ( 6-10, 87.1) 19- 4 416 A Bedford (13- 3, 96.0) 8-16 418 H Concord ( 8-10, 88.3) 19- 4 423 H Bishop Guertin (15- 0, 99.9) 8-14 428 H Nashua North ( 1-17, 82.5) 20- 1 502 A Portsmouth (16- 4, 92.5) 11- 5 505 A Pinkerton Academy (15- 2, 96.5) 8-11 507 H Merrimack (10- 6, 91.4) 12- 1 509 H Dover ( 9-11, 87.6) 16- 6 512 A Londonderry (10- 8, 90.5) 10- 7 514 H Bedford (13- 3, 96.0) 6-11 516 H Keene-Monadnock ( 3-12, 84.0) 12- 0 519 H Manchester Memorial- ( 3-12, 84.6) 17- 3 521 H Nashua South ( 8-11, 86.2) 14- 1 528 A Bishop Guertin (15- 0, 99.9) 6- 7 609 H Merrimack (10- 6, 91.4) 10- 7 611 N Pinkerton Academy (15- 2, 96.5) 6-13
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
414 A Windham 19- 4 15 7 0.00
416 A Bedford 8-16 -8 -2 - -2.90
418 H Concord 19- 4 15 6 0.00
423 H Bishop Guertin 8-14 -6 -5 0.00
428 H Nashua North 20- 1 19 12 0.00
502 A Portsmouth 11- 5 6 1 + 3.64
505 A Pinkerton Academy 8-11 -3 -3 -0.39
507 H Merrimack 12- 1 11 3 1.77
509 H Dover 16- 6 10 7 0.00
512 A Londonderry 10- 7 3 3 -0.35
514 H Bedford 6-11 -5 -1 - -3.66
516 H Keene-Monadnock 12- 0 12 11 0.00
519 H Manchester Memorial- 17- 3 14 10 0.00
521 H Nashua South 14- 1 13 8 0.00
528 A Bishop Guertin 6- 7 -1 -6 ++ 4.00
609 H Merrimack 10- 7 3 3 -0.23
611 N Pinkerton Academy 6-13 -7 -2 - -2.77
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 416 A Bedford 8-16 -8 -2 - -2.90 514 H Bedford 6-11 -5 -1 - -3.66 611 N Pinkerton Academy 6-13 -7 -2 - -2.77 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 528 A Bishop Guertin 6- 7 -1 -6 ++ 4.00 502 A Portsmouth 11- 5 6 1 + 3.64 |
Exeter HS Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvirne | Exeter HS | Exeter HS 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Bedford | Bedford | Bedford | ||
| Bishop Brady | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Bow | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Campbell | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Coe-Brown | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Concord | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| ConVal | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Derryfield | Exeter HS | tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) | Exeter HS | |
| Dover | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Gilford | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Goffstown | Exeter HS | Exeter HS 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Hanover | Exeter HS | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Exeter HS | |
| Hollis-Brookline | Exeter HS | Exeter HS 5- 0 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Hopkinton | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Inter-Lakes-Moultonb | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| John Stark | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Kearsarge | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Keene-Monadnock | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Kennett | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Kingswood | Exeter HS | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Exeter HS | |
| Laconia | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Lebanon | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Londonderry | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Manchester Memorial- | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Merrimack | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Merrimack Valley | Exeter HS | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Exeter HS | |
| Milford | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Nashua North | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Nashua South | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Oyster River-Newmark | Exeter HS | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Exeter HS | |
| Pelham | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Pembroke Academy | Exeter HS | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Exeter HS | |
| Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Plymouth Regional | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Portsmouth | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Salem | Exeter HS | Exeter HS 9- 3 vs 4- 8 | ||
| Souhegan | Exeter HS | Exeter HS 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Spaulding | Exeter HS | Exeter HS 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| St Thomas Aquinas | Exeter HS | insuffient: ( 4- 0)( 3- 1) | Exeter HS | |
| Stevens | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Timberlane | Exeter HS | insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) | Exeter HS | |
| Trinity Manchester | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Windham | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Winnacunnet | Exeter HS | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Exeter HS |
PowerWise = 43
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 16.30
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Windham ( 6-10, 87.1) 19- 4 -12.80 13.79 0.38 0.96 13.58
0 A Bedford (13- 3, 96.0) 8-16 -3.91 22.68 0.38 0.96 -3.39
0 H Concord ( 8-10, 88.3) 19- 4 -11.56 15.04 -0.38 0.96 14.06
0 H Bishop Guertin (15- 0, 99.9) 8-14 -0.00 26.60 -0.38 0.96 -0.36
0 H Nashua North ( 1-17, 82.5) 20- 1 -17.43 9.17 -0.38 0.96 8.43
0 A Portsmouth (16- 4, 92.5) 11- 5 -7.37 19.22 0.38 0.96 18.79
0 A Pinkerton Acad (15- 2, 96.5) 8-11 -3.40 23.20 0.38 0.96 -2.89
0 H Merrimack (10- 6, 91.4) 12- 1 -8.48 18.12 -0.38 0.96 17.01
0 H Dover ( 9-11, 87.6) 16- 6 -12.34 14.26 -0.38 0.96 13.31
0 A Londonderry (10- 8, 90.5) 10- 7 -9.36 17.23 0.38 0.96 16.88
0 H Bedford (13- 3, 96.0) 6-11 -3.91 22.68 -0.38 0.96 -4.11
0 H Keene-Monadnoc ( 3-12, 84.0) 12- 0 -15.85 10.74 -0.38 0.96 9.94
0 H Manchester Mem ( 3-12, 84.6) 17- 3 -15.25 11.34 -0.38 0.96 10.51
0 H Nashua South ( 8-11, 86.2) 14- 1 -13.67 12.93 -0.38 0.96 12.03
0 A Bishop Guertin (15- 0, 99.9) 6- 7 -0.00 26.60 0.38 0.96 -0.36
0 H Merrimack (10- 6, 91.4) 10- 7 -8.48 18.12 -0.38 0.96 17.01
0 N Pinkerton Acad (15- 2, 96.5) 6-13 -3.40 23.20 -0.00 0.96 -3.26
------
137.17
|
winning pts = 151.5414 losing points = -14.3746
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------