---    UPDATED: 07-28-25 17:10 PDT

safe3step boys Dorman 1
  
Dorman                
W-L: (15- 4) PR = 93.2636

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 228 A Riverside ( 5-10, 87.3) 14- 7 301 A River Bluff ( 9- 6, 89.8) 11- 8 304 H Wade Hampton ( 3-11, 78.9) 18- 1 306 H Fort Mill ( 9- 7, 92.3) 9-13 308 H Lexington ( 7- 9, 89.9) 10- 9 312 H JL Mann Academy ( 6- 6, 91.0) 17-12 314 A Boiling Springs (13- 4, 95.3) 9-16 317 H Clover (11- 2, 94.5) 18-16 319 H Christ Church Episco (10- 7, 93.1) 13- 9 321 A Legion Collegiate Ac ( 3- 1, 91.9) 7- 6 324 A TL Hanna ( 7- 8, 84.8) 17- 7 328 A Byrnes ( 7- 8, 89.4) 5- 4 403 A Mauldin (13- 4, 93.2) 9-10 404 H Spartanburg ( 8- 8, 89.7) 13-12 415 H Eastside ( 9- 8, 90.5) 8- 6 422 H JL Mann Academy ( 6- 6, 91.0) 11- 8 425 A Clover (11- 2, 94.5) 17-13 428 A Boiling Springs (13- 4, 95.3) 12-11 503 N Wando (12- 1, 99.7) 1-18

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   228 A Riverside              14- 7       7     6           0.00
   301 A River Bluff            11- 8       3     3          -0.14
   304 H Wade Hampton           18- 1      17    15           0.00
   306 H Fort Mill               9-13      -4     1    --    -5.34
   308 H Lexington              10- 9       1     4    -     -2.75
   312 H JL Mann Academy        17-12       5     3    +      2.36
   314 A Boiling Springs         9-16      -7    -2    -     -2.59
   317 H Clover                 18-16       2    -1    +      2.93
   319 H Christ Church Episco   13- 9       4     1    +      3.47
   321 A Legion Collegiate Ac    7- 6       1     1          -0.06
   324 A TL Hanna               17- 7      10     8           0.00
   328 A Byrnes                  5- 4       1     4    -     -2.51
   403 A Mauldin                 9-10      -1     0          -0.77
   404 H Spartanburg            13-12       1     4    -     -2.90
   415 H Eastside                8- 6       2     3          -1.06
   422 H JL Mann Academy        11- 8       3     3           0.36
   425 A Clover                 17-13       4    -2    ++     5.60
   428 A Boiling Springs        12-11       1    -2    +      3.41
   503 N Wando                   1-18     -17    -6           0.00

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   306 H Fort Mill               9-13      -4     1    --    -5.34
   308 H Lexington              10- 9       1     4    -     -2.75
   314 A Boiling Springs         9-16      -7    -2    -     -2.59
   328 A Byrnes                  5- 4       1     4    -     -2.51
   404 H Spartanburg            13-12       1     4    -     -2.90

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   425 A Clover                 17-13       4    -2    ++     5.60
   312 H JL Mann Academy        17-12       5     3    +      2.36
   317 H Clover                 18-16       2    -1    +      2.93
   319 H Christ Church Episco   13- 9       4     1    +      3.47
   428 A Boiling Springs        12-11       1    -2    +      3.41

Dorman Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
AC Flora AC Flora tied - ( 4- 1) ( 4- 1) AC Flora
Academic Magnet Char Dorman insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Dorman
Aiken Dorman insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Dorman
Atlantic Collegiate Dorman   Dorman
Beaufort Dorman   Dorman
Bishop England Dorman insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Dorman
Bluffton Dorman   Dorman
Blythewood Dorman Dorman   4- 0 vs 1- 3
Boiling Springs Boiling Springs tied - ( 8- 1) ( 8- 1) Boiling Springs
Byrnes Dorman Dorman  
Camden Military Acad Dorman insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Dorman
Carolina Forest Dorman insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Dorman
Catawba Ridge Dorman Dorman   4- 2 vs 1- 5
Chapin Chapin insuffient: ( 5- 4)( 4- 4) Chapin
Christ Church Episco Dorman Dorman  
Clover Dorman Dorman  
Dutch Fork Dorman Dorman   4- 1 vs 0- 5
Eastside Dorman Dorman  
Fort Mill Fort Mill Fort Mill  
Fox Creek Dorman insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Dorman
Gilbert Dorman insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Dorman
Greenville Dorman insuffient: ( 7- 2)( 6- 2) Dorman
Hammond School Dorman insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Dorman
Heathwood Hall Dorman   Dorman
Hillcrest Dorman Dorman   3- 1 vs 1- 3
Hilton Head Dorman   Dorman
Hilton Head Christia Dorman   Dorman
James Island Charter Dorman tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Dorman
JL Mann Academy Dorman Dorman  
Laurence Manning Aca Dorman   Dorman
Legion Collegiate Ac Dorman Dorman  
Lexington Dorman Dorman  
Lucy Beckham Lucy Beckham tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 1) Lucy Beckham
Mauldin Mauldin Mauldin  
May River Dorman tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Dorman
Myrtle Beach Dorman   Dorman
Nation Ford Dorman tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 2) Dorman
North Myrtle Beach Dorman   Dorman
Oceanside Academy Oceanside Academy tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 0) Oceanside Academy
Philip Simmons Dorman   Dorman
Porter-Gaud Porter-Gaud tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Porter-Gaud
River Bluff Dorman Dorman  
Riverside Dorman Dorman  
Socastee Dorman insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Dorman
Spartanburg Dorman Dorman  
Spring Valley Dorman Dorman   4- 0 vs 1- 3
St James Dorman tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Dorman
St Joseph Catholic Dorman Dorman   6- 0 vs 0- 6
TL Hanna Dorman Dorman  
Trinity Collegiate Dorman   Dorman
Waccamaw Dorman insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Dorman
Wade Hampton Dorman Dorman  
Wando Wando Wando  
Westside Dorman Dorman   5- 0 vs 0- 5
White Knoll Dorman Dorman   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Woodmont Dorman Dorman   5- 1 vs 1- 5

PowerWise = 47


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 13.54

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Riverside       ( 5-10, 87.3)    14- 7      -12.58      14.03       0.33         0.71            10.24
   0 A River Bluff     ( 9- 6, 89.8)    11- 8      -10.11      16.49       0.33         0.71            11.99
   0 H Wade Hampton    ( 3-11, 78.9)    18- 1      -21.03       5.57      -0.33         0.71             3.73
   0 H Fort Mill       ( 9- 7, 92.3)     9-13       -7.64      18.96      -0.33         0.71            -5.69
   0 H Lexington       ( 7- 9, 89.9)    10- 9      -10.05      16.56      -0.33         0.71            11.56
   0 H JL Mann Academ  ( 6- 6, 91.0)    17-12       -8.94      17.66      -0.33         0.71            12.35
   0 A Boiling Spring  (13- 4, 95.3)     9-16       -4.56      22.04       0.33         0.71            -3.01
   0 H Clover          (11- 2, 94.5)    18-16       -5.37      21.23      -0.33         0.71            14.90
   0 H Christ Church   (10- 7, 93.1)    13- 9       -6.83      19.77      -0.33         0.71            13.86
   0 A Legion Collegi  ( 3- 1, 91.9)     7- 6       -8.03      18.58       0.33         0.71            13.48
   0 A TL Hanna        ( 7- 8, 84.8)    17- 7      -15.09      11.51       0.33         0.71             8.44
   0 A Byrnes          ( 7- 8, 89.4)     5- 4      -10.48      16.12       0.33         0.71            11.73
   0 A Mauldin         (13- 4, 93.2)     9-10       -6.74      19.87       0.33         0.71            -4.56
   0 H Spartanburg     ( 8- 8, 89.7)    13-12      -10.20      16.40      -0.33         0.71            11.46
   0 H Eastside        ( 9- 8, 90.5)     8- 6       -9.37      17.24      -0.33         0.71            12.05
   0 H JL Mann Academ  ( 6- 6, 91.0)    11- 8       -8.94      17.66      -0.33         0.71            12.35
   0 A Clover          (11- 2, 94.5)    17-13       -5.37      21.23       0.33         0.71            15.37
   0 A Boiling Spring  (13- 4, 95.3)    12-11       -4.56      22.04       0.33         0.71            15.95
   0 N Wando           (12- 1, 99.7)     1-18       -0.19      26.42      -0.00         0.71            -0.13
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       166.08

winning pts = 179.4723 losing points = -13.3951

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------