Davis
W-L: (19- 1) PR = 97.7630
Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score
304 H Riverton ( 5-11, 86.5) 16- 4
311 A Bingham ( 8-11, 89.2) 15- 5
321 A Park City (15- 4, 97.8) 9- 8
325 H Woods Cross (14- 6, 93.1) 7- 6
328 H American Fork ( 4-15, 85.2) 16- 2
408 H Syracuse ( 5-15, 85.3) 21- 3
410 A Fremont (12- 6, 92.7) 13-10
415 A Layton ( 2-16, 81.0) 20- 4
417 H Weber (11- 8, 89.9) 17- 6
422 A Farmington (14- 5, 95.0) 15- 5
424 A Syracuse ( 5-15, 85.3) 21- 2
429 H Fremont (12- 6, 92.7) 18- 5
501 H Layton ( 2-16, 81.0) 19- 2
503 A Northridge (12- 6, 92.7) 23- 6
505 H Farmington (14- 5, 95.0) 12- 7
506 A Weber (11- 8, 89.9) 17- 3
515 H Syracuse ( 5-15, 85.3) 23- 7
517 H Fremont (12- 6, 92.7) 18- 6
521 N Skyridge (15- 1, 95.8) 11-10
523 N Corner Canyon (19- 0, 99.9) 7- 9
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
304 H Riverton 16- 4 12 12 0.00
311 A Bingham 15- 5 10 8 0.00
321 A Park City 9- 8 1 -1 1.52
325 H Woods Cross 7- 6 1 5 -- -4.00
328 H American Fork 16- 2 14 13 0.00
408 H Syracuse 21- 3 18 13 0.00
410 A Fremont 13-10 3 5 -1.50
415 A Layton 20- 4 16 16 0.00
417 H Weber 17- 6 11 8 0.00
422 A Farmington 15- 5 10 2 + 2.78
424 A Syracuse 21- 2 19 12 0.00
429 H Fremont 18- 5 13 6 0.00
501 H Layton 19- 2 17 17 0.00
503 A Northridge 23- 6 17 4 0.50
505 H Farmington 12- 7 5 3 1.73
506 A Weber 17- 3 14 7 0.00
515 H Syracuse 23- 7 16 13 0.00
517 H Fremont 18- 6 12 6 0.00
521 N Skyridge 11-10 1 2 -0.95
523 N Corner Canyon 7- 9 -2 -2 0.14
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
325 H Woods Cross 7- 6 1 5 -- -4.00
|
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
422 A Farmington 15- 5 10 2 + 2.78
|
Davis Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent |
Who Gets the Point?
| Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
Alta |
Davis |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) |
Davis |
American Fork |
Davis |
Davis |
 
| |
Bear River |
Davis |
|
tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) |
Davis |
Bingham |
Davis |
Davis |
 
| |
Bonneville |
Davis |
|
Davis   5- 0 vs 0- 5 |
|
Bountiful |
Davis |
|
Davis   5- 0 vs 2- 3 |
|
Box Elder |
Davis |
|
Davis   5- 1 vs 1- 5 |
|
Brighton |
Brighton |
|
insuffient: ( 4- 1)( 3- 2) |
Brighton |
Canyon View |
Davis |
|
 
| Davis |
Cedar |
Davis |
|
 
| Davis |
Cedar Valley |
Davis |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) |
Davis |
Clearfield |
Davis |
|
Davis   4- 0 vs 1- 3 |
|
Copper Hills |
Davis |
|
Davis   3- 1 vs 0- 4 |
|
Corner Canyon |
Corner Canyon |
Corner Canyon |
 
| |
Crimson Cliffs |
Davis |
|
 
| Davis |
Desert Hills |
Davis |
|
 
| Davis |
Dixie |
Davis |
|
 
| Davis |
East |
Davis |
|
Davis   3- 1 vs 1- 3 |
|
Farmington |
Davis |
Davis |
 
| |
Fremont |
Davis |
Davis |
 
| |
Green Canyon |
Davis |
|
Davis   3- 0 vs 0- 3 |
|
Herriman |
Davis |
|
tied - ( 4- 1) ( 4- 1) |
Davis |
Highland |
Davis |
|
Davis   4- 0 vs 2- 2 |
|
Hillcrest |
Davis |
|
Davis   3- 0 vs 0- 3 |
|
Hurricane |
Davis |
|
 
| Davis |
Jordan |
Davis |
|
 
| Davis |
Juan Diego Catholic |
Davis |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Davis |
Judge Memorial Catho |
Davis |
|
Davis   2- 1 vs 0- 3 |
|
Layton |
Davis |
Davis |
 
| |
Lehi |
Davis |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) |
Davis |
Logan |
Davis |
|
Davis   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
Lone Peak |
Davis |
|
Davis   5- 1 vs 3- 3 |
|
Maple Mountain |
Davis |
|
 
| Davis |
Mountain Crest |
Davis |
|
 
| Davis |
Mountain Ridge |
Davis |
|
Davis   5- 1 vs 3- 3 |
|
Mountain View |
Davis |
|
 
| Davis |
Northridge |
Davis |
Davis |
 
| |
Olympus |
Davis |
|
insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 2- 2) |
Davis |
Orem |
Davis |
|
Davis   3- 0 vs 0- 3 |
|
Park City |
Davis |
Davis |
 
| |
Payson |
Davis |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Davis |
Pine View |
Davis |
|
 
| Davis |
Pleasant Grove |
Davis |
|
Davis   4- 1 vs 0- 5 |
|
Provo |
Davis |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Davis |
Ridgeline |
Davis |
|
 
| Davis |
Riverton |
Davis |
Davis |
 
| |
Roy |
Davis |
|
Davis   6- 0 vs 1- 5 |
|
Salem Hills |
Davis |
|
Davis   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
Sky View |
Davis |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) |
Davis |
Skyline |
Davis |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) |
Davis |
Skyridge |
Davis |
Davis |
 
| |
Snow Canyon |
Davis |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Davis |
Spanish Fork |
Davis |
|
insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) |
Davis |
Springville |
Davis |
|
 
| Davis |
Syracuse |
Davis |
Davis |
 
| |
Timpanogos |
Davis |
|
 
| Davis |
Timpview |
Davis |
|
Davis   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
Viewmont |
Davis |
|
Davis   6- 0 vs 1- 5 |
|
Wasatch |
Davis |
|
Davis   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
Waterford |
Davis |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Davis |
Weber |
Davis |
Davis |
 
| |
West |
Davis |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Davis |
West Field |
Davis |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Davis |
West Jordan |
Davis |
|
Davis   4- 0 vs 0- 4 |
|
Westlake |
Davis |
|
Davis   4- 0 vs 2- 2 |
|
Woods Cross |
Davis |
Davis |
 
| |
PowerWise = 64

division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 18.63
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Riverton ( 5-11, 86.5) 16- 4 -13.37 16.14 -0.53 0.93 14.55
0 A Bingham ( 8-11, 89.2) 15- 5 -10.71 18.80 0.53 0.93 18.00
0 A Park City (15- 4, 97.8) 9- 8 -2.14 27.37 0.53 0.93 25.98
0 H Woods Cross (14- 6, 93.1) 7- 6 -6.81 22.70 -0.53 0.93 20.65
0 H American Fork ( 4-15, 85.2) 16- 2 -14.68 14.83 -0.53 0.93 13.33
0 H Syracuse ( 5-15, 85.3) 21- 3 -14.58 14.93 -0.53 0.93 13.42
0 A Fremont (12- 6, 92.7) 13-10 -7.16 22.35 0.53 0.93 21.30
0 A Layton ( 2-16, 81.0) 20- 4 -18.92 10.59 0.53 0.93 10.35
0 H Weber (11- 8, 89.9) 17- 6 -10.00 19.52 -0.53 0.93 17.69
0 A Farmington (14- 5, 95.0) 15- 5 -4.88 24.63 0.53 0.93 23.43
0 A Syracuse ( 5-15, 85.3) 21- 2 -14.58 14.93 0.53 0.93 14.39
0 H Fremont (12- 6, 92.7) 18- 5 -7.16 22.35 -0.53 0.93 20.32
0 H Layton ( 2-16, 81.0) 19- 2 -18.92 10.59 -0.53 0.93 9.38
0 A Northridge (12- 6, 92.7) 23- 6 -7.16 22.35 0.53 0.93 21.30
0 H Farmington (14- 5, 95.0) 12- 7 -4.88 24.63 -0.53 0.93 22.45
0 A Weber (11- 8, 89.9) 17- 3 -10.00 19.52 0.53 0.93 18.66
0 H Syracuse ( 5-15, 85.3) 23- 7 -14.58 14.93 -0.53 0.93 13.42
0 H Fremont (12- 6, 92.7) 18- 6 -7.16 22.35 -0.53 0.93 20.32
0 N Skyridge (15- 1, 95.8) 11-10 -4.09 25.42 -0.00 0.93 23.67
0 N Corner Canyon (19- 0, 99.9) 7- 9 -0.00 29.51 -0.00 0.93 -0.00
------
342.60
|
winning pts = 342.6034 losing points = 0.0000
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------