Chapin
W-L: (10- 7) PR = 93.5339Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 224 H Nation Ford ( 8- 5, 92.9) 11-12 227 H Fort Mill ( 9- 7, 92.3) 13- 8 301 H Mauldin (13- 4, 93.2) 7-12 304 A Boiling Springs (13- 4, 95.3) 12-21 308 A Wando (12- 1, 99.7) 6-11 313 A White Knoll ( 6- 7, 85.3) 16- 9 317 A Blythewood ( 7- 8, 84.0) 15- 1 320 H River Bluff ( 9- 6, 89.8) 18- 5 322 H AC Flora (14- 4, 93.4) 12-13 327 A Lexington ( 7- 9, 89.9) 14- 8 402 A Greenville ( 9- 4, 91.7) 19-13 403 H Dutch Fork ( 4-11, 85.3) 20- 5 407 H Spring Valley ( 9- 7, 81.7) 23- 2 410 H Eastside ( 9- 8, 90.5) 10- 6 415 A Clover (11- 2, 94.5) 12-13 426 H Socastee ( 8- 8, 84.7) 20- 2 429 H Lucy Beckham (11- 1, 99.9) 1-11
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
224 H Nation Ford 11-12 -1 1 -1.95
227 H Fort Mill 13- 8 5 2 + 3.39
301 H Mauldin 7-12 -5 1 -- -5.70
304 A Boiling Springs 12-21 -9 -2 - -2.86
308 A Wando 6-11 -5 -7 0.00
313 A White Knoll 16- 9 7 8 0.00
317 A Blythewood 15- 1 14 9 0.00
320 H River Bluff 18- 5 13 4 0.92
322 H AC Flora 12-13 -1 0 -1.45
327 A Lexington 14- 8 6 3 1.65
402 A Greenville 19-13 6 1 + 3.51
403 H Dutch Fork 20- 5 15 9 0.00
407 H Spring Valley 23- 2 21 12 0.00
410 H Eastside 10- 6 4 3 0.67
415 A Clover 12-13 -1 -1 0.33
426 H Socastee 20- 2 18 9 0.00
429 H Lucy Beckham 1-11 -10 -6 0.00
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 301 H Mauldin 7-12 -5 1 -- -5.70 304 A Boiling Springs 12-21 -9 -2 - -2.86 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 227 H Fort Mill 13- 8 5 2 + 3.39 402 A Greenville 19-13 6 1 + 3.51 |
Chapin Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC Flora | AC Flora | AC Flora | ||
| Academic Magnet Char | Chapin | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Chapin | |
| Aiken | Chapin | Chapin 3- 1 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Atlantic Collegiate | Chapin | Chapin | ||
| Beaufort | Chapin | Chapin | ||
| Bishop England | Chapin | tied - ( 0- 3) ( 0- 3) | Chapin | |
| Bluffton | Chapin | Chapin | ||
| Blythewood | Chapin | Chapin | ||
| Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | ||
| Byrnes | Chapin | Chapin 4- 2 vs 1- 5 | ||
| Camden Military Acad | Chapin | Chapin 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Carolina Forest | Chapin | Chapin 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Catawba Ridge | Chapin | Chapin 3- 3 vs 1- 5 | ||
| Christ Church Episco | Chapin | insuffient: ( 3- 5)( 4- 4) | Chapin | |
| Clover | Clover | Clover | ||
| Dorman | Chapin | tied - ( 4- 4) ( 4- 4) | Chapin | |
| Dutch Fork | Chapin | Chapin | ||
| Eastside | Chapin | Chapin | ||
| Fort Mill | Chapin | Chapin | ||
| Fox Creek | Chapin | Chapin 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Gilbert | Chapin | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Chapin | |
| Greenville | Chapin | Chapin | ||
| Hammond School | Chapin | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Chapin | |
| Heathwood Hall | Chapin | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) | Chapin | |
| Hillcrest | Chapin | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Chapin | |
| Hilton Head | Chapin | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Chapin | |
| Hilton Head Christia | Chapin | Chapin | ||
| James Island Charter | Chapin | tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 2) | Chapin | |
| JL Mann Academy | Chapin | insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 2- 3) | Chapin | |
| Laurence Manning Aca | Chapin | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Chapin | |
| Legion Collegiate Ac | Chapin | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Chapin | |
| Lexington | Chapin | Chapin | ||
| Lucy Beckham | Lucy Beckham | Lucy Beckham | ||
| Mauldin | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| May River | Chapin | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) | Chapin | |
| Myrtle Beach | Chapin | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Chapin | |
| Nation Ford | Nation Ford | Nation Ford | ||
| North Myrtle Beach | Chapin | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Chapin | |
| Oceanside Academy | Oceanside Academy | Oceanside Academy 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Philip Simmons | Chapin | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Chapin | |
| Porter-Gaud | Porter-Gaud | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | Porter-Gaud | |
| River Bluff | Chapin | Chapin | ||
| Riverside | Chapin | Chapin 3- 2 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Socastee | Chapin | Chapin | ||
| Spartanburg | Chapin | Chapin 3- 3 vs 1- 5 | ||
| Spring Valley | Chapin | Chapin | ||
| St James | Chapin | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) | Chapin | |
| St Joseph Catholic | Chapin | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Chapin | |
| TL Hanna | Chapin | Chapin 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Trinity Collegiate | Chapin | Chapin 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Waccamaw | Chapin | Chapin 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Wade Hampton | Chapin | Chapin 3- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Wando | Wando | Wando | ||
| Westside | Chapin | Chapin 3- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| White Knoll | Chapin | Chapin | ||
| Woodmont | Chapin | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Chapin |
PowerWise = 47
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.54
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Nation Ford ( 8- 5, 92.9) 11-12 -6.98 19.63 -0.33 0.80 -5.83
0 H Fort Mill ( 9- 7, 92.3) 13- 8 -7.64 18.96 -0.33 0.80 14.84
0 H Mauldin (13- 4, 93.2) 7-12 -6.74 19.87 -0.33 0.80 -5.63
0 A Boiling Spring (13- 4, 95.3) 12-21 -4.56 22.04 0.33 0.80 -3.37
0 A Wando (12- 1, 99.7) 6-11 -0.19 26.42 0.33 0.80 -0.12
0 A White Knoll ( 6- 7, 85.3) 16- 9 -14.60 12.00 0.33 0.80 9.83
0 A Blythewood ( 7- 8, 84.0) 15- 1 -15.95 10.66 0.33 0.80 8.76
0 H River Bluff ( 9- 6, 89.8) 18- 5 -10.11 16.49 -0.33 0.80 12.87
0 H AC Flora (14- 4, 93.4) 12-13 -6.48 20.12 -0.33 0.80 -5.43
0 A Lexington ( 7- 9, 89.9) 14- 8 -10.05 16.56 0.33 0.80 13.46
0 A Greenville ( 9- 4, 91.7) 19-13 -8.19 18.41 0.33 0.80 14.94
0 H Dutch Fork ( 4-11, 85.3) 20- 5 -14.59 12.01 -0.33 0.80 9.30
0 H Spring Valley ( 9- 7, 81.7) 23- 2 -18.23 8.38 -0.33 0.80 6.41
0 H Eastside ( 9- 8, 90.5) 10- 6 -9.37 17.24 -0.33 0.80 13.47
0 A Clover (11- 2, 94.5) 12-13 -5.37 21.23 0.33 0.80 -4.01
0 H Socastee ( 8- 8, 84.7) 20- 2 -15.25 11.36 -0.33 0.80 8.78
0 H Lucy Beckham (11- 1, 99.9) 1-11 -0.00 26.60 -0.33 0.80 -0.27
------
88.01
|
winning pts = 112.6572 losing points = -24.6485
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------