Centennial
W-L: (10- 4) PR = 93.3212Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 414 A Blaine ( 9- 8, 93.1) 12-11 416 A Champlin Park ( 9- 6, 91.2) 8- 7 423 H Spring Lake Park/Coo ( 8- 7, 90.1) 19- 6 430 H Anoka (12- 3, 92.4) 15- 8 502 H Farmington (14- 1, 97.9) 4-14 506 H Edina (18- 1, 99.9) 6-16 509 A Andover (12- 3, 92.5) 8- 9 514 A Maple Grove ( 5-10, 89.9) 12- 8 517 H Roseville ( 2-10, 88.7) 9- 8 519 H Robbinsdale Armstron ( 4-10, 86.9) 11- 4 521 A Rogers (10- 4, 92.7) 11-10 523 H Rochester United ( 4-11, 87.5) 17- 5 529 H Chisago Lakes ( 7- 8, 90.6) 18- 8 603 H Anoka (12- 3, 92.4) 13-14
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
414 A Blaine 12-11 1 -1 1.54
416 A Champlin Park 8- 7 1 1 -0.42
423 H Spring Lake Park/Coo 19- 6 13 4 1.01
430 H Anoka 15- 8 7 2 + 3.30
502 H Farmington 4-14 -10 -4 -1.20
506 H Edina 6-16 -10 -6 0.00
509 A Andover 8- 9 -1 0 -1.04
514 A Maple Grove 12- 8 4 3 1.33
517 H Roseville 9- 8 1 5 -- -4.00
519 H Robbinsdale Armstron 11- 4 7 7 0.00
521 A Rogers 11-10 1 0 1.10
523 H Rochester United 17- 5 12 7 0.00
529 H Chisago Lakes 18- 8 10 4 1.49
603 H Anoka 13-14 -1 2 - -2.70
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 517 H Roseville 9- 8 1 5 -- -4.00 603 H Anoka 13-14 -1 2 - -2.70 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 430 H Anoka 15- 8 7 2 + 3.30 |
Centennial Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andover | Andover | Andover | ||
| Anoka | Centennial | tied - ( 5- 1) ( 5- 1) | Centennial | |
| Becker | Centennial | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Centennial | |
| Benilde-St Margarets | Benilde-St Margarets | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Benilde-St Margarets | |
| Big Lake/Princeton | Centennial | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Centennial | |
| Blaine | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Blake School | Centennial | Centennial 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Bloomington Jefferso | Bloomington Jefferso | Bloomington Jefferso | ||
| Bloomington Kennedy/ | Centennial | Centennial 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Brainerd | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Breck School | Centennial | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Centennial | |
| Buffalo | Centennial | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Centennial | |
| Champlin Park | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Chanhassen | Centennial | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Centennial | |
| Chaska | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Chisago Lakes | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Cloquet/Esko/Carlton | Centennial | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Centennial | |
| Cretin-Derham Hall | Cretin-Derham Hall | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Cretin-Derham Hall | |
| Delano/Rockford | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Duluth East/Denfield | Centennial | Centennial 4- 1 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Duluth Marshall | Centennial | Centennial 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Eagan | Centennial | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Centennial | |
| East Ridge | East Ridge | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | East Ridge | |
| Eastview/Apple Valle | Centennial | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Centennial | |
| Eden Prairie | Eden Prairie | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Eden Prairie | |
| Edina | Edina | Edina | ||
| Elk River/Zimmerman | Centennial | Centennial 5- 1 vs 1- 5 | ||
| Farmington | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Forest Lake | Centennial | Centennial 5- 1 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Grand Rapids/Greenwa | Centennial | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Centennial | |
| Hastings | Centennial | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Centennial | |
| Hermantown/Proctor | Centennial | Centennial 2- 1 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Hill-Murray | Hill-Murray | tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) | Hill-Murray | |
| Holy Angels | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Holy Family Catholic | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Hopkins/St Louis Par | Centennial | Centennial 3- 1 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Hutchinson | Centennial | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 1) | Centennial | |
| Irondale | Irondale | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Irondale | |
| Lakeville North | Lakeville North | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) | Lakeville North | |
| Lakeville South | Centennial | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Centennial | |
| Mahtomedi | Mahtomedi | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Mahtomedi | |
| Mankato United | Centennial | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Centennial | |
| Maple Grove | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Minneapolis United | Centennial | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | Centennial | |
| Minnetonka | Minnetonka | tied - ( 3- 1) ( 3- 1) | Minnetonka | |
| Monticello | Centennial | Centennial 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Moorhead | Moorhead | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Moorhead | |
| Mound Westonka | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Mounds View | Centennial | tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) | Centennial | |
| New Prague | New Prague | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | New Prague | |
| Northfield | Centennial | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Centennial | |
| Orono | Orono | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Orono | |
| Osseo/Park Center | Centennial | Centennial 6- 1 vs 0- 6 | ||
| Owatonna | Centennial | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) | Centennial | |
| Park Cottage Grove | Centennial | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Centennial | |
| Prior Lake | Prior Lake | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | Prior Lake | |
| Providence Academy | Centennial | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Centennial | |
| Robbinsdale Armstron | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Rochester United | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Rocori | Centennial | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Centennial | |
| Rogers | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Rosemount | Rosemount | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Rosemount | |
| Roseville | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Sartell/Sauk Rapids | Centennial | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Centennial | |
| Shakopee | Centennial | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Centennial | |
| Simley | Centennial | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Centennial | |
| Southwest Christian | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Spring Lake Park/Coo | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| St Cloud Unified | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| St Michael-Albertvil | Centennial | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Centennial | |
| St Paul/Two Rivers | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| St Thomas Academy | St Thomas Academy | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | St Thomas Academy | |
| Stillwater | Stillwater | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Stillwater | |
| Totino Grace | Centennial | Centennial 6- 1 vs 0- 6 | ||
| TriMAC Academy | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Waconia | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Wayzata | Wayzata | tied - ( 3- 1) ( 3- 1) | Wayzata | |
| White Bear Lake | White Bear Lake | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | White Bear Lake | |
| Woodbury | Woodbury | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Woodbury |
PowerWise = 56
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 14.62
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Blaine ( 9- 8, 93.1) 12-11 -6.78 18.29 0.74 1.04 19.88
0 A Champlin Park ( 9- 6, 91.2) 8- 7 -8.74 16.33 0.74 1.04 17.83
0 H Spring Lake Pa ( 8- 7, 90.1) 19- 6 -9.83 15.24 -0.74 1.04 15.14
0 H Anoka (12- 3, 92.4) 15- 8 -7.54 17.52 -0.74 1.04 17.53
0 H Farmington (14- 1, 97.9) 4-14 -2.04 23.03 -0.74 1.04 -2.91
0 H Edina (18- 1, 99.9) 6-16 -0.00 25.07 -0.74 1.04 -0.77
0 A Andover (12- 3, 92.5) 8- 9 -7.36 17.71 0.74 1.04 -6.92
0 A Maple Grove ( 5-10, 89.9) 12- 8 -9.99 15.07 0.74 1.04 16.52
0 H Roseville ( 2-10, 88.7) 9- 8 -11.23 13.84 -0.74 1.04 13.68
0 H Robbinsdale Ar ( 4-10, 86.9) 11- 4 -13.03 12.04 -0.74 1.04 11.80
0 A Rogers (10- 4, 92.7) 11-10 -7.22 17.85 0.74 1.04 19.42
0 H Rochester Unit ( 4-11, 87.5) 17- 5 -12.41 12.66 -0.74 1.04 12.45
0 H Chisago Lakes ( 7- 8, 90.6) 18- 8 -9.35 15.72 -0.74 1.04 15.65
0 H Anoka (12- 3, 92.4) 13-14 -7.54 17.52 -0.74 1.04 -8.65
------
140.66
|
winning pts = 159.9109 losing points = -19.2490
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------