Cape Elizabeth
W-L: ( 9- 6) PR = 95.3471Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 419 H South Portland (12- 4, 95.1) 7- 6 423 A Scarborough ( 8- 8, 91.7) 3- 5 502 H Messalonskee (13- 4, 93.1) 9- 5 507 A Yarmouth (12- 3, 97.0) 0-10 509 H Falmouth (14- 1, 99.9) 2-17 514 H Windham (10- 5, 93.1) 10- 1 516 A Thornton Academy (11- 4, 96.3) 5-10 520 A Falmouth (14- 1, 99.9) 3-14 522 H Deering ( 8- 8, 91.9) 11- 4 527 H Thornton Academy (11- 4, 96.3) 6-10 531 A Brunswick (10- 6, 91.7) 7- 4 602 H Yarmouth (12- 3, 97.0) 6- 5 611 H Noble/Sanford ( 8- 7, 86.9) 16- 2 613 A Windham (10- 5, 93.1) 14- 3 618 A Falmouth (14- 1, 99.9) 9- 8
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
419 H South Portland 7- 6 1 1 0.00
423 A Scarborough 3- 5 -2 3 -- -4.88
502 H Messalonskee 9- 5 4 3 1.04
507 A Yarmouth 0-10 -10 -2 - -2.59
509 H Falmouth 2-17 -15 -4 -1.19
514 H Windham 10- 1 9 3 + 2.02
516 A Thornton Academy 5-10 -5 -2 - -3.31
520 A Falmouth 3-14 -11 -5 0.00
522 H Deering 11- 4 7 4 0.85
527 H Thornton Academy 6-10 -4 0 - -3.79
531 A Brunswick 7- 4 3 3 0.11
602 H Yarmouth 6- 5 1 -1 1.93
611 H Noble/Sanford 16- 2 14 9 0.00
613 A Windham 14- 3 11 1 + 3.50
618 A Falmouth 9- 8 1 -5 +++ 6.00
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 423 A Scarborough 3- 5 -2 3 -- -4.88 507 A Yarmouth 0-10 -10 -2 - -2.59 516 A Thornton Academy 5-10 -5 -2 - -3.31 527 H Thornton Academy 6-10 -4 0 - -3.79 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 618 A Falmouth 9- 8 1 -5 +++ 6.00 514 H Windham 10- 1 9 3 + 2.02 613 A Windham 14- 3 11 1 + 3.50 |
Cape Elizabeth Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bangor | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Biddeford | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Bonny Eagle | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth 3- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Brewer | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth | ||
| Brunswick | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth | ||
| Camden Hills Regiona | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Cheverus | Cape Elizabeth | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Cape Elizabeth | |
| Cony | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth | ||
| Deering | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth | ||
| Edward Little | Cape Elizabeth | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Cape Elizabeth | |
| Erskine Academy | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth | ||
| Falmouth | Falmouth | Falmouth | ||
| Freeport | Cape Elizabeth | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 1) | Cape Elizabeth | |
| Fryeburg Academy | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth 2- 1 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Gardiner Area | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Gorham | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth 4- 2 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Gray/New Gloucester/ | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth 2- 1 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Greely | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth 2- 1 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Hampden Academy | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Houlton/Hogdon | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth | ||
| John Bapst Memorial | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth | ||
| Kennebunk | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth 4- 0 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Lake Region | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth | ||
| Lawrence/Winslow | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth | ||
| Lewiston | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Lincoln Academy | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth | ||
| Maranacook-Winthrop | Cape Elizabeth | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Cape Elizabeth | |
| Marshwood | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth 4- 3 vs 1- 5 | ||
| Massabesic | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| MCI-Nokomis | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth | ||
| Messalonskee | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth | ||
| Morse/Boothbay | Cape Elizabeth | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Cape Elizabeth | |
| Mount Ararat | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Mount Blue | Cape Elizabeth | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Cape Elizabeth | |
| Noble/Sanford | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth | ||
| North Yarmouth Acade | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth 3- 1 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Oak Hill | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Oxford Hills | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth | ||
| Portland | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth 4- 1 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Scarborough | Scarborough | Scarborough | ||
| South Portland | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth | ||
| Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy | ||
| Traip Academy | Cape Elizabeth | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Cape Elizabeth | |
| Waynflete School | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth | ||
| Wells | Cape Elizabeth | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Cape Elizabeth | |
| Westbrook | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Windham | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth | ||
| Yarmouth | Yarmouth | tied - ( 3- 2) ( 3- 1) | Yarmouth | |
| York | York | insuffient: ( 4- 2)( 3- 2) | York |
PowerWise = 44
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.00
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H South Portland (12- 4, 95.1) 7- 6 -4.81 23.63 -0.74 0.93 21.26
0 A Scarborough ( 8- 8, 91.7) 3- 5 -8.18 20.26 0.74 0.93 -6.91
0 H Messalonskee (13- 4, 93.1) 9- 5 -6.77 21.67 -0.74 0.93 19.43
0 A Yarmouth (12- 3, 97.0) 0-10 -2.88 25.56 0.74 0.93 -1.99
0 H Falmouth (14- 1, 99.9) 2-17 -0.00 28.44 -0.74 0.93 -0.69
0 H Windham (10- 5, 93.1) 10- 1 -6.79 21.65 -0.74 0.93 19.42
0 A Thornton Acade (11- 4, 96.3) 5-10 -3.60 24.84 0.74 0.93 -2.65
0 A Falmouth (14- 1, 99.9) 3-14 -0.00 28.44 0.74 0.93 -0.69
0 H Deering ( 8- 8, 91.9) 11- 4 -7.96 20.48 -0.74 0.93 18.33
0 H Thornton Acade (11- 4, 96.3) 6-10 -3.60 24.84 -0.74 0.93 -4.03
0 A Brunswick (10- 6, 91.7) 7- 4 -8.18 20.26 0.74 0.93 19.50
0 H Yarmouth (12- 3, 97.0) 6- 5 -2.88 25.56 -0.74 0.93 23.05
0 H Noble/Sanford ( 8- 7, 86.9) 16- 2 -12.99 15.45 -0.74 0.93 13.66
0 A Windham (10- 5, 93.1) 14- 3 -6.79 21.65 0.74 0.93 20.79
0 A Falmouth (14- 1, 99.9) 9- 8 -0.00 28.44 0.74 0.93 27.10
------
165.58
|
winning pts = 182.5315 losing points = -16.9522
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------