---    UPDATED: 07-28-25 17:11 PDT

safe3step boys Bingham 1
  
Bingham               
W-L: ( 8-11) PR = 89.1904

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 305 H West Jordan ( 1-18, 81.4) 15- 2 307 A Pleasant Grove ( 4-16, 85.6) 11- 3 311 H Davis (19- 1, 97.8) 5-15 314 H Roy ( 4-14, 84.5) 6- 4 319 A Spanish Fork (11- 9, 89.2) 7- 9 321 H Highland (13- 8, 92.5) 5-11 325 A Westlake ( 9- 9, 89.0) 7- 8 327 A Lone Peak (14- 5, 95.5) 3-10 328 H Hillcrest ( 2-15, 79.7) 12- 4 409 A Northridge (12- 6, 92.7) 3-12 411 A Park City (15- 4, 97.8) 3-18 415 H Cedar Valley (12- 6, 89.0) 14- 8 417 H Copper Hills ( 5-11, 86.0) 13-11 422 A Riverton ( 5-11, 86.5) 11- 6 424 H Mountain Ridge (14- 6, 91.6) 8- 9 429 A Herriman (12- 8, 90.5) 9-11 501 H Corner Canyon (19- 0, 99.9) 0-17 509 H American Fork ( 4-15, 85.2) 11- 3 515 A Lone Peak (14- 5, 95.5) 4-11

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   305 H West Jordan            15- 2      13     8           0.00
   307 A Pleasant Grove         11- 3       8     3           1.89
   311 H Davis                   5-15     -10    -8           0.00
   314 H Roy                     6- 4       2     5    -     -3.00
   319 A Spanish Fork            7- 9      -2    -1          -1.49
   321 H Highland                5-11      -6    -3    -     -2.26
   325 A Westlake                7- 8      -1     0          -0.70
   327 A Lone Peak               3-10      -7    -7           0.00
   328 H Hillcrest              12- 4       8    10           0.00
   409 A Northridge              3-12      -9    -4          -0.93
   411 A Park City               3-18     -15    -9           0.00
   415 H Cedar Valley           14- 8       6     1    ++     4.30
   417 H Copper Hills           13-11       2     4          -1.72
   422 A Riverton               11- 6       5     2    +      2.87
   424 H Mountain Ridge          8- 9      -1    -2           0.93
   429 A Herriman                9-11      -2    -2          -0.17
   501 H Corner Canyon           0-17     -17   -10           0.00
   509 H American Fork          11- 3       8     4           0.51
   515 A Lone Peak               4-11      -7    -7           0.00

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   314 H Roy                     6- 4       2     5    -     -3.00
   321 H Highland                5-11      -6    -3    -     -2.26

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   415 H Cedar Valley           14- 8       6     1    ++     4.30
   422 A Riverton               11- 6       5     2    +      2.87

Bingham Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Alta Alta Alta   4- 3 vs 1- 6
American Fork Bingham Bingham  
Bear River Bear River tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Bear River
Bonneville Bingham Bingham   4- 1 vs 1- 4
Bountiful Bountiful tied - ( 2- 4) ( 2- 4) Bountiful
Box Elder Box Elder insuffient: ( 1- 4)( 2- 3) Box Elder
Brighton Brighton Brighton   4- 2 vs 2- 4
Canyon View Bingham   Bingham
Cedar Bingham   Bingham
Cedar Valley Bingham Bingham  
Clearfield Bingham insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) Bingham
Copper Hills Bingham Bingham  
Corner Canyon Corner Canyon Corner Canyon  
Crimson Cliffs Bingham   Bingham
Davis Davis Davis  
Desert Hills Bingham   Bingham
Dixie Bingham   Bingham
East East insuffient: ( 3- 5)( 4- 4) East
Farmington Farmington Farmington   3- 2 vs 1- 4
Fremont Fremont Fremont   4- 1 vs 2- 3
Green Canyon Bingham insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Bingham
Herriman Herriman Herriman  
Highland Highland Highland  
Hillcrest Bingham Bingham  
Hurricane Bingham   Bingham
Jordan Bingham insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Bingham
Juan Diego Catholic Juan Diego Catholic insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) Juan Diego Catholic
Judge Memorial Catho Judge Memorial Catho insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 2- 2) Judge Memorial Catho
Layton Bingham insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) Bingham
Lehi Bingham Bingham   5- 3 vs 3- 5
Logan Bingham insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) Bingham
Lone Peak Lone Peak Lone Peak  
Maple Mountain Maple Mountain Maple Mountain   5- 3 vs 3- 5
Mountain Crest Bingham insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Bingham
Mountain Ridge Mountain Ridge Mountain Ridge  
Mountain View Bingham tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Bingham
Northridge Northridge Northridge  
Olympus Olympus Olympus   5- 2 vs 1- 6
Orem Bingham Bingham   4- 0 vs 1- 3
Park City Park City Park City  
Payson Payson Payson   3- 2 vs 1- 4
Pine View Bingham   Bingham
Pleasant Grove Bingham Bingham  
Provo Bingham Bingham   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Ridgeline Bingham tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Bingham
Riverton Bingham Bingham  
Roy Bingham Bingham  
Salem Hills Bingham Bingham   3- 2 vs 1- 4
Sky View Sky View   Sky View
Skyline Skyline tied - ( 3- 4) ( 3- 4) Skyline
Skyridge Skyridge Skyridge   8- 1 vs 4- 5
Snow Canyon Bingham tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Bingham
Spanish Fork Spanish Fork Spanish Fork  
Springville Bingham insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) Bingham
Syracuse Bingham tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) Bingham
Timpanogos Bingham insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) Bingham
Timpview Bingham insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) Bingham
Viewmont Bingham Bingham   4- 3 vs 2- 5
Wasatch Wasatch insuffient: ( 2- 7)( 3- 6) Wasatch
Waterford Waterford insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 4- 0) Waterford
Weber Weber tied - ( 4- 2) ( 4- 2) Weber
West Bingham Bingham   3- 3 vs 0- 6
West Field West Field insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) West Field
West Jordan Bingham Bingham  
Westlake Westlake Westlake  
Woods Cross Woods Cross insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) Woods Cross

PowerWise = 35


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 18.63

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H West Jordan     ( 1-18, 81.4)    15- 2      -18.48      11.03      -0.53         0.98            10.30
   0 A Pleasant Grove  ( 4-16, 85.6)    11- 3      -14.34      15.17       0.53         0.98            15.38
   0 H Davis           (19- 1, 97.8)     5-15       -2.14      27.37      -0.53         0.98            -2.61
   0 H Roy             ( 4-14, 84.5)     6- 4      -15.41      14.10      -0.53         0.98            13.31
   0 A Spanish Fork    (11- 9, 89.2)     7- 9      -10.73      18.78       0.53         0.98           -10.00
   0 H Highland        (13- 8, 92.5)     5-11       -7.44      22.07      -0.53         0.98            -7.81
   0 A Westlake        ( 9- 9, 89.0)     7- 8      -10.94      18.58       0.53         0.98           -10.21
   0 A Lone Peak       (14- 5, 95.5)     3-10       -4.41      25.10       0.53         0.98            -3.81
   0 H Hillcrest       ( 2-15, 79.7)    12- 4      -20.20       9.31      -0.53         0.98             8.62
   0 A Northridge      (12- 6, 92.7)     3-12       -7.16      22.35       0.53         0.98            -6.51
   0 A Park City       (15- 4, 97.8)     3-18       -2.14      27.37       0.53         0.98            -1.58
   0 H Cedar Valley    (12- 6, 89.0)    14- 8      -10.89      18.62      -0.53         0.98            17.74
   0 H Copper Hills    ( 5-11, 86.0)    13-11      -13.90      15.61      -0.53         0.98            14.79
   0 A Riverton        ( 5-11, 86.5)    11- 6      -13.37      16.14       0.53         0.98            16.34
   0 H Mountain Ridge  (14- 6, 91.6)     8- 9       -8.26      21.25      -0.53         0.98            -8.61
   0 A Herriman        (12- 8, 90.5)     9-11       -9.41      20.10       0.53         0.98            -8.71
   0 H Corner Canyon   (19- 0, 99.9)     0-17       -0.00      29.51      -0.53         0.98            -0.51
   0 H American Fork   ( 4-15, 85.2)    11- 3      -14.68      14.83      -0.53         0.98            14.03
   0 A Lone Peak       (14- 5, 95.5)     4-11       -4.41      25.10       0.53         0.98            -3.81
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        46.35

winning pts = 110.5137 losing points = -64.1668

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------