Bishop Guertin
W-L: (15- 0) PR = 99.9000Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 423 A Exeter HS (11- 6, 94.3) 14- 8 424 A Merrimack (10- 6, 91.4) 16- 3 425 A Windham ( 6-10, 87.1) 17- 3 429 H Concord ( 8-10, 88.3) 21- 4 501 A Bedford (13- 3, 96.0) 17-11 505 A Salem ( 5-10, 85.1) 16- 6 509 H Nashua North ( 1-17, 82.5) 23- 2 513 A Pinkerton Academy (15- 2, 96.5) 16- 8 521 H Keene-Monadnock ( 3-12, 84.0) 17- 2 523 H Dover ( 9-11, 87.6) 16-10 528 H Exeter HS (11- 6, 94.3) 7- 6 529 A Londonderry (10- 8, 90.5) 18- 4 607 H Concord ( 8-10, 88.3) 19- 2 611 N Bedford (13- 3, 96.0) 12- 8 614 N Pinkerton Academy (15- 2, 96.5) 19- 5
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
423 A Exeter HS 14- 8 6 5 0.00
424 A Merrimack 16- 3 13 8 0.00
425 A Windham 17- 3 14 12 0.00
429 H Concord 21- 4 17 12 0.00
501 A Bedford 17-11 6 4 1.47
505 A Salem 16- 6 10 14 0.00
509 H Nashua North 23- 2 21 18 0.00
513 A Pinkerton Academy 16- 8 8 3 1.98
521 H Keene-Monadnock 17- 2 15 16 0.00
523 H Dover 16-10 6 13 0.00
528 H Exeter HS 7- 6 1 6 -- -4.00
529 A Londonderry 18- 4 14 9 0.00
607 H Concord 19- 2 17 12 0.00
611 N Bedford 12- 8 4 4 0.09
614 N Pinkerton Academy 19- 5 14 3 1.60
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 528 H Exeter HS 7- 6 1 6 -- -4.00 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* |
Bishop Guertin Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvirne | Bishop Guertin | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Bishop Guertin | |
| Bedford | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Bishop Brady | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Bow | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Campbell | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Coe-Brown | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Concord | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| ConVal | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Derryfield | Bishop Guertin | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Bishop Guertin | |
| Dover | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Exeter HS | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Gilford | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Goffstown | Bishop Guertin | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Bishop Guertin | |
| Hanover | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Hollis-Brookline | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Hopkinton | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Inter-Lakes-Moultonb | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| John Stark | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Kearsarge | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Keene-Monadnock | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Kennett | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Kingswood | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Laconia | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Lebanon | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Londonderry | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Manchester Memorial- | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin 11- 0 vs 2- 9 | ||
| Merrimack | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Merrimack Valley | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Milford | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Nashua North | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Nashua South | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin 11- 0 vs 4- 7 | ||
| Oyster River-Newmark | Bishop Guertin | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Bishop Guertin | |
| Pelham | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Pembroke Academy | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Pinkerton Academy | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Plymouth Regional | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Portsmouth | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Salem | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Souhegan | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Spaulding | Bishop Guertin | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Bishop Guertin | |
| St Thomas Aquinas | Bishop Guertin | tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) | Bishop Guertin | |
| Stevens | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Timberlane | Bishop Guertin | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Bishop Guertin | |
| Trinity Manchester | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Windham | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Winnacunnet | Bishop Guertin | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Bishop Guertin |
PowerWise = 46
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 16.30
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Exeter HS (11- 6, 94.3) 14- 8 -5.63 20.96 0.38 1.09 23.19
0 A Merrimack (10- 6, 91.4) 16- 3 -8.48 18.12 0.38 1.09 20.09
0 A Windham ( 6-10, 87.1) 17- 3 -12.80 13.79 0.38 1.09 15.40
0 H Concord ( 8-10, 88.3) 21- 4 -11.56 15.04 -0.38 1.09 15.93
0 A Bedford (13- 3, 96.0) 17-11 -3.91 22.68 0.38 1.09 25.06
0 A Salem ( 5-10, 85.1) 16- 6 -14.76 11.83 0.38 1.09 13.27
0 H Nashua North ( 1-17, 82.5) 23- 2 -17.43 9.17 -0.38 1.09 9.55
0 A Pinkerton Acad (15- 2, 96.5) 16- 8 -3.40 23.20 0.38 1.09 25.62
0 H Keene-Monadnoc ( 3-12, 84.0) 17- 2 -15.85 10.74 -0.38 1.09 11.26
0 H Dover ( 9-11, 87.6) 16-10 -12.34 14.26 -0.38 1.09 15.08
0 H Exeter HS (11- 6, 94.3) 7- 6 -5.63 20.96 -0.38 1.09 22.37
0 A Londonderry (10- 8, 90.5) 18- 4 -9.36 17.23 0.38 1.09 19.13
0 H Concord ( 8-10, 88.3) 19- 2 -11.56 15.04 -0.38 1.09 15.93
0 N Bedford (13- 3, 96.0) 12- 8 -3.91 22.68 -0.00 1.09 24.65
0 N Pinkerton Acad (15- 2, 96.5) 19- 5 -3.40 23.20 -0.00 1.09 25.21
------
281.72
|
winning pts = 281.7241 losing points = 0.0000
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------