---    UPDATED: 07-28-25 17:11 PDT

safe3step boys Maple Mountain 1
  
Maple Mountain        
W-L: (13- 7) PR = 91.8667

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 307 A West Field (16- 4, 93.9) 8-10 311 A Mountain Ridge (14- 6, 91.6) 7- 8 314 H Ridgeline ( 6-13, 87.1) 19- 6 319 H Roy ( 4-14, 84.5) 15- 0 321 A Herriman (12- 8, 90.5) 8- 1 321 H Mountain View ( 6-12, 81.7) 10- 2 326 H Alta (14- 5, 95.9) 12-23 328 A Bonneville ( 1-17, 79.2) 20- 3 409 A Lone Peak (14- 5, 95.5) 8- 9 411 H Pleasant Grove ( 4-16, 85.6) 5- 4 415 A Westlake ( 9- 9, 89.0) 19- 6 418 A Springville ( 6-11, 84.9) 18- 3 423 H Wasatch ( 9-10, 89.7) 8- 3 425 H Timpview (12- 7, 88.8) 15- 7 430 H Brighton (18- 3, 98.0) 12-16 502 H Salem Hills ( 4-12, 85.8) 15- 3 507 A Spanish Fork (11- 9, 89.2) 15- 5 509 A Cedar Valley (12- 6, 89.0) 7-12 515 H Cedar Valley (12- 6, 89.0) 6- 4 517 A Olympus (15- 5, 94.5) 7-13

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   307 A West Field              8-10      -2    -3           0.56
   311 A Mountain Ridge          7- 8      -1     0          -0.70
   314 H Ridgeline              19- 6      13     5           0.00
   319 H Roy                    15- 0      15     8           0.00
   321 A Herriman                8- 1       7     1    ++     4.15
   321 H Mountain View          10- 2       8    11           0.00
   326 H Alta                   12-23     -11    -4          -1.47
   328 A Bonneville             20- 3      17    12           0.00
   409 A Lone Peak               8- 9      -1    -4    +      3.15
   411 H Pleasant Grove          5- 4       1     7    --    -4.00
   415 A Westlake               19- 6      13     2    +      2.62
   418 A Springville            18- 3      15     6           0.00
   423 H Wasatch                 8- 3       5     3    +      2.27
   425 H Timpview               15- 7       8     4           1.36
   430 H Brighton               12-16      -4    -6           1.00
   502 H Salem Hills            15- 3      12     7           0.00
   507 A Spanish Fork           15- 5      10     2    +      2.83
   509 A Cedar Valley            7-12      -5     2    ---   -7.33
   515 H Cedar Valley            6- 4       2     3          -1.38
   517 A Olympus                 7-13      -6    -3          -1.83

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   509 A Cedar Valley            7-12      -5     2    ---   -7.33
   411 H Pleasant Grove          5- 4       1     7    --    -4.00

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   321 A Herriman                8- 1       7     1    ++     4.15
   409 A Lone Peak               8- 9      -1    -4    +      3.15
   415 A Westlake               19- 6      13     2    +      2.62
   423 H Wasatch                 8- 3       5     3    +      2.27
   507 A Spanish Fork           15- 5      10     2    +      2.83

Maple Mountain Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Alta Alta Alta  
American Fork Maple Mountain Maple Mountain   5- 3 vs 2- 5
Bear River Maple Mountain tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Maple Mountain
Bingham Maple Mountain Maple Mountain   6- 3 vs 3- 5
Bonneville Maple Mountain Maple Mountain  
Bountiful Maple Mountain tied - ( 3- 3) ( 3- 3) Maple Mountain
Box Elder Maple Mountain insuffient: ( 6- 1)( 5- 2) Maple Mountain
Brighton Brighton Brighton  
Canyon View Maple Mountain   Maple Mountain
Cedar Maple Mountain insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Maple Mountain
Cedar Valley Maple Mountain Maple Mountain   8- 1 vs 6- 3
Clearfield Maple Mountain Maple Mountain   6- 0 vs 3- 3
Copper Hills Maple Mountain Maple Mountain   4- 3 vs 0- 6
Corner Canyon Corner Canyon Corner Canyon   7- 0 vs 2- 5
Crimson Cliffs Maple Mountain insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Maple Mountain
Davis Davis   Davis
Desert Hills Maple Mountain Maple Mountain   2- 1 vs 0- 3
Dixie Maple Mountain insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Maple Mountain
East Maple Mountain insuffient: ( 3- 4)( 2- 4) Maple Mountain
Farmington Farmington tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) Farmington
Fremont Fremont insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) Fremont
Green Canyon Maple Mountain tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Maple Mountain
Herriman Maple Mountain Maple Mountain  
Highland Highland insuffient: ( 3- 5)( 4- 4) Highland
Hillcrest Maple Mountain Maple Mountain   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Hurricane Maple Mountain insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Maple Mountain
Jordan Maple Mountain Maple Mountain   2- 1 vs 0- 3
Juan Diego Catholic Juan Diego Catholic insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 4- 1) Juan Diego Catholic
Judge Memorial Catho Judge Memorial Catho Judge Memorial Catho   4- 2 vs 2- 4
Layton Maple Mountain insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Maple Mountain
Lehi Maple Mountain Maple Mountain   6- 3 vs 3- 5
Logan Maple Mountain insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 2- 2) Maple Mountain
Lone Peak Lone Peak Lone Peak  
Mountain Crest Maple Mountain insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) Maple Mountain
Mountain Ridge Mountain Ridge Mountain Ridge  
Mountain View Maple Mountain Maple Mountain  
Northridge Northridge tied - ( 3- 2) ( 3- 2) Northridge
Olympus Olympus Olympus  
Orem Maple Mountain Maple Mountain   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Park City Park City Park City   5- 0 vs 1- 4
Payson Maple Mountain Maple Mountain   8- 1 vs 6- 3
Pine View Maple Mountain   Maple Mountain
Pleasant Grove Maple Mountain Maple Mountain  
Provo Maple Mountain Maple Mountain   6- 1 vs 0- 6
Ridgeline Maple Mountain Maple Mountain  
Riverton Maple Mountain insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) Maple Mountain
Roy Maple Mountain Maple Mountain  
Salem Hills Maple Mountain Maple Mountain  
Sky View Maple Mountain tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) Maple Mountain
Skyline Maple Mountain Maple Mountain   3- 4 vs 1- 6
Skyridge Skyridge Skyridge   7- 0 vs 5- 2
Snow Canyon Maple Mountain   Maple Mountain
Spanish Fork Maple Mountain Maple Mountain  
Springville Maple Mountain Maple Mountain  
Syracuse Maple Mountain insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Maple Mountain
Timpanogos Maple Mountain Maple Mountain   6- 1 vs 3- 3
Timpview Maple Mountain Maple Mountain  
Viewmont Maple Mountain Maple Mountain   5- 1 vs 2- 4
Wasatch Maple Mountain Maple Mountain  
Waterford Maple Mountain tied - ( 4- 0) ( 4- 0) Maple Mountain
Weber Maple Mountain insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) Maple Mountain
West Maple Mountain insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 0- 4) Maple Mountain
West Field West Field West Field  
West Jordan Maple Mountain Maple Mountain   4- 3 vs 0- 7
Westlake Maple Mountain Maple Mountain  
Woods Cross Woods Cross tied - ( 4- 2) ( 4- 2) Woods Cross

PowerWise = 49


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 18.63

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A West Field      (16- 4, 93.9)     8-10       -6.00      23.51       0.53         0.93            -5.10
   0 A Mountain Ridge  (14- 6, 91.6)     7- 8       -8.26      21.25       0.53         0.93            -7.20
   0 H Ridgeline       ( 6-13, 87.1)    19- 6      -12.83      16.68      -0.53         0.93            15.04
   0 H Roy             ( 4-14, 84.5)    15- 0      -15.41      14.10      -0.53         0.93            12.65
   0 A Herriman        (12- 8, 90.5)     8- 1       -9.41      20.10       0.53         0.93            19.21
   0 H Mountain View   ( 6-12, 81.7)    10- 2      -18.24      11.27      -0.53         0.93            10.01
   0 H Alta            (14- 5, 95.9)    12-23       -3.98      25.53      -0.53         0.93            -4.20
   0 A Bonneville      ( 1-17, 79.2)    20- 3      -20.75       8.76       0.53         0.93             8.65
   0 A Lone Peak       (14- 5, 95.5)     8- 9       -4.41      25.10       0.53         0.93            -3.62
   0 H Pleasant Grove  ( 4-16, 85.6)     5- 4      -14.34      15.17      -0.53         0.93            13.64
   0 A Westlake        ( 9- 9, 89.0)    19- 6      -10.94      18.58       0.53         0.93            17.79
   0 A Springville     ( 6-11, 84.9)    18- 3      -15.02      14.49       0.53         0.93            13.98
   0 H Wasatch         ( 9-10, 89.7)     8- 3      -10.24      19.27      -0.53         0.93            17.46
   0 H Timpview        (12- 7, 88.8)    15- 7      -11.15      18.37      -0.53         0.93            16.62
   0 H Brighton        (18- 3, 98.0)    12-16       -1.91      27.60      -0.53         0.93            -2.26
   0 H Salem Hills     ( 4-12, 85.8)    15- 3      -14.14      15.37      -0.53         0.93            13.82
   0 A Spanish Fork    (11- 9, 89.2)    15- 5      -10.73      18.78       0.53         0.93            17.98
   0 A Cedar Valley    (12- 6, 89.0)     7-12      -10.89      18.62       0.53         0.93            -9.65
   0 H Cedar Valley    (12- 6, 89.0)     6- 4      -10.89      18.62      -0.53         0.93            16.86
   0 A Olympus         (15- 5, 94.5)     7-13       -5.39      24.13       0.53         0.93            -4.53
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       157.15

winning pts = 193.7074 losing points = -36.5597

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------