Whitefish Bay
W-L: ( 6-10) PR = 87.7686Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 402 A Brookfield ( 0-15, 84.6) 9- 3 404 H Catholic Memorial ( 2-14, 86.6) 2- 6 411 A Muskego ( 5-13, 87.7) 9- 8 414 H Homestead (12- 8, 93.5) 3-15 417 A Janesville ( 9- 9, 93.0) 5-15 421 H West Bend ( 5-12, 89.7) 9- 8 424 H Hamilton (10- 7, 92.2) 8- 9 428 A Cedarburg ( 7- 9, 89.0) 12-10 502 H University Milwauke (12- 6, 93.4) 2- 9 505 A Homestead (12- 8, 93.5) 5-13 508 H Franklin ( 6-11, 90.3) 7- 6 512 A West Bend ( 5-12, 89.7) 4- 8 517 H Notre Dame Green Ba ( 7-12, 89.0) 9-10 519 H Cedarburg ( 7- 9, 89.0) 6-10 522 A Oak Creek ( 1-16, 84.7) 12- 9 527 H Muskego ( 5-13, 87.7) 6-10
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
402 A Brookfield 9- 3 6 2 + 2.66
404 H Catholic Memorial 2- 6 -4 2 --- -6.06
411 A Muskego 9- 8 1 -1 1.81
414 H Homestead 3-15 -12 -5 -0.10
417 A Janesville 5-15 -10 -6 0.00
421 H West Bend 9- 8 1 -1 + 2.09
424 H Hamilton 8- 9 -1 -4 + 2.56
428 A Cedarburg 12-10 2 -2 ++ 4.13
502 H University Milwauke 2- 9 -7 -5 -0.20
505 A Homestead 5-13 -8 -7 0.00
508 H Franklin 7- 6 1 -2 + 2.69
512 A West Bend 4- 8 -4 -3 -1.20
517 H Notre Dame Green Ba 9-10 -1 0 -0.64
519 H Cedarburg 6-10 -4 0 - -3.58
522 A Oak Creek 12- 9 3 2 0.74
527 H Muskego 6-10 -4 1 -- -4.89
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 404 H Catholic Memorial 2- 6 -4 2 --- -6.06 527 H Muskego 6-10 -4 1 -- -4.89 519 H Cedarburg 6-10 -4 0 - -3.58 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 428 A Cedarburg 12-10 2 -2 ++ 4.13 402 A Brookfield 9- 3 6 2 + 2.66 421 H West Bend 9- 8 1 -1 + 2.09 424 H Hamilton 8- 9 -1 -4 + 2.56 508 H Franklin 7- 6 1 -2 + 2.69 |
Whitefish Bay Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appleton | Appleton | insuffient: ( 2- 3)( 3- 0) | Appleton | |
| Arrowhead | Arrowhead | Arrowhead 6- 0 vs 3- 5 | ||
| Bay Port | Bay Port | Bay Port 3- 0 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Brookfield | Whitefish Bay | Whitefish Bay | ||
| Catholic Memorial | Catholic Memorial | Catholic Memorial | ||
| Cedarburg | Cedarburg | tied - ( 3- 5) ( 3- 3) | Cedarburg | |
| De Pere | De Pere | tied - ( 2- 3) ( 2- 2) | De Pere | |
| DeForest | DeForest | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | DeForest | |
| Elkhorn | Elkhorn | Elkhorn 6- 2 vs 3- 6 | ||
| Franklin | Whitefish Bay | Whitefish Bay | ||
| Hamilton | Hamilton | Hamilton | ||
| Homestead | Homestead | Homestead | ||
| Hudson | Hudson | Hudson | ||
| Janesville | Janesville | Janesville | ||
| Kenosha | Kenosha | Kenosha 8- 1 vs 5- 7 | ||
| Kettle Moraine | Kettle Moraine | Kettle Moraine 4- 0 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Kimberly | Kimberly | Kimberly 4- 0 vs 1- 4 | ||
| La Crosse | La Crosse | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | La Crosse | |
| Madison | Madison | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Madison | |
| Marquette University | Marquette University | Marquette University 7- 0 vs 2- 6 | ||
| Middleton | Middleton | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Middleton | |
| Mukwonago | Mukwonago | Mukwonago 6- 0 vs 2- 6 | ||
| Muskego | Whitefish Bay | insuffient: ( 4- 3)( 3- 3) | Whitefish Bay | |
| Neenah | Neenah | Neenah 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Notre Dame Green Ba | Notre Dame Green Ba | Notre Dame Green Ba | ||
| Oak Creek | Whitefish Bay | Whitefish Bay | ||
| Oconomowoc | Oconomowoc | tied - ( 5- 4) ( 5- 2) | Oconomowoc | |
| Oneida Nation | Whitefish Bay | Whitefish Bay 2- 3 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Oregon | Oregon | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Oregon | |
| Pulaski | Whitefish Bay | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) | Whitefish Bay | |
| Sauk Prairie | Whitefish Bay | insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 2- 2) | Whitefish Bay | |
| Sun Prairie | Sun Prairie | Sun Prairie 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Superior | Whitefish Bay | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 1) | Whitefish Bay | |
| University Milwauke | University Milwauke | University Milwauke | ||
| Verona | Verona | Verona 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Waukesha | Waukesha | insuffient: ( 2- 3)( 3- 1) | Waukesha | |
| Waunakee | Waunakee | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Waunakee | |
| Wausau | Wausau | insuffient: ( 0- 3)( 1- 2) | Wausau | |
| Wauwatosa | Wauwatosa | insuffient: ( 5- 8)( 4- 6) | Wauwatosa | |
| West Bend | West Bend | tied - ( 1- 3) ( 1- 2) | West Bend |
PowerWise = 8
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 16.73
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Brookfield ( 0-15, 84.6) 9- 3 -15.33 2.06 0.85 1.05 3.04
0 H Catholic Memor ( 2-14, 86.6) 2- 6 -13.34 4.05 -0.85 1.05 -14.84
0 A Muskego ( 5-13, 87.7) 9- 8 -12.17 5.21 0.85 1.05 6.34
0 H Homestead (12- 8, 93.5) 3-15 -6.38 11.00 -0.85 1.05 -7.57
0 A Janesville ( 9- 9, 93.0) 5-15 -6.90 10.48 0.85 1.05 -6.32
0 H West Bend ( 5-12, 89.7) 9- 8 -10.19 7.20 -0.85 1.05 6.63
0 H Hamilton (10- 7, 92.2) 8- 9 -7.72 9.66 -0.85 1.05 -8.97
0 A Cedarburg ( 7- 9, 89.0) 12-10 -10.86 6.53 0.85 1.05 7.72
0 H University Mi (12- 6, 93.4) 2- 9 -6.47 10.91 -0.85 1.05 -7.66
0 A Homestead (12- 8, 93.5) 5-13 -6.38 11.00 0.85 1.05 -5.78
0 H Franklin ( 6-11, 90.3) 7- 6 -9.59 7.79 -0.85 1.05 7.26
0 A West Bend ( 5-12, 89.7) 4- 8 -10.19 7.20 0.85 1.05 -9.76
0 H Notre Dame Gr ( 7-12, 89.0) 9-10 -10.92 6.47 -0.85 1.05 -12.31
0 H Cedarburg ( 7- 9, 89.0) 6-10 -10.86 6.53 -0.85 1.05 -12.25
0 A Oak Creek ( 1-16, 84.7) 12- 9 -15.24 2.14 0.85 1.05 3.13
0 H Muskego ( 5-13, 87.7) 6-10 -12.17 5.21 -0.85 1.05 -13.62
------
-64.95
|
winning pts = 34.1246 losing points = -99.0786
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------