Arlington
W-L: ( 3-12) PR = 85.7755Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 317 H Glacier Peak (11- 2, 93.9) 7-12 319 H Shorecrest ( 6-12, 87.4) 10-11 325 A Glacier Peak (11- 2, 93.9) 4-17 402 A Snohomish ( 9- 5, 91.7) 2-10 404 A Lincoln ( 3- 6, 87.2) 3- 4 405 H Rogers (12- 3, 94.9) 3-19 416 A Shorecrest ( 6-12, 87.4) 4- 7 418 H Stanwood ( 3-12, 82.7) 10- 5 418 H Stanwood ( 3-12, 82.7) 10- 5 421 H Lake Stevens ( 7- 7, 90.0) 3- 7 423 H Jackson ( 0- 9, 75.1) 13- 2 425 H Snohomish ( 9- 5, 91.7) 9-14 429 A Stanwood ( 3-12, 82.7) 7-11 430 A Lake Stevens ( 7- 7, 90.0) 6-10 502 A Nathan Hale (10- 2, 92.1) 2-10
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
317 H Glacier Peak 7-12 -5 -8 0.00
319 H Shorecrest 10-11 -1 -1 0.06
325 A Glacier Peak 4-17 -13 -9 0.00
402 A Snohomish 2-10 -8 -6 0.00
404 A Lincoln 3- 4 -1 -2 0.93
405 H Rogers 3-19 -16 -9 0.00
416 A Shorecrest 4- 7 -3 -2 -0.90
418 H Stanwood 10- 5 5 4 1.45
418 H Stanwood 10- 5 5 4 1.45
421 H Lake Stevens 3- 7 -4 -4 -0.25
423 H Jackson 13- 2 11 11 0.00
425 H Snohomish 9-14 -5 -5 0.00
429 A Stanwood 7-11 -4 3 --- -6.51
430 A Lake Stevens 6-10 -4 -5 0.79
502 A Nathan Hale 2-10 -8 -7 0.00
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 429 A Stanwood 7-11 -4 3 --- -6.51 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* |
Arlington Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anacortes | Anacortes | Anacortes | ||
| Archbishop Murphy | Archbishop Murphy | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Archbishop Murphy | |
| Auburn Riverside | Auburn Riverside | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Auburn Riverside | |
| Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | Bainbridge Island | |
| Ballard | Ballard | Ballard 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Bellarmine Prep | Bellarmine Prep | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Bellarmine Prep | |
| Bellevue | Bellevue | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Bellevue | |
| Bellingham | Arlington | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Arlington | |
| Blanchet | Blanchet | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Blanchet | |
| Bonney Lake | Bonney Lake | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Bonney Lake | |
| Bothell | Bothell | Bothell 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Burlington-Edison | Arlington | Arlington | ||
| Camas | Camas | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | Camas | |
| Cedarcrest | Arlington | Arlington | ||
| Chiawana | Chiawana | Chiawana | ||
| Curtis | Curtis | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | Curtis | |
| East Valley | East Valley | East Valley | ||
| Eastlake | Eastlake | Eastlake 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Eastside Catholic | Eastside Catholic | Eastside Catholic | ||
| Emerald Ridge | Arlington | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Arlington | |
| Enumclaw | Enumclaw | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Enumclaw | |
| Franklin | Franklin | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Franklin | |
| Gig Harbor | Gig Harbor | Gig Harbor | ||
| Glacier Peak | Glacier Peak | Glacier Peak | ||
| Graham Kapowsin | Graham Kapowsin | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Graham Kapowsin | |
| Hanford | Hanford | Hanford | ||
| Hermiston | Hermiston | Hermiston | ||
| Inglemoor | Arlington | Arlington | ||
| Interlake | Arlington | Arlington | ||
| Issaquah | Issaquah | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Issaquah | |
| Jackson | Arlington | Arlington | ||
| Juanita | Juanita | Juanita | ||
| Kamiak | Arlington | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Arlington | |
| Kamiakin | Kamiakin | Kamiakin | ||
| Kennedy Catholic | Kennedy Catholic | Kennedy Catholic | ||
| Klahowya | Arlington | Arlington | ||
| Lake Stevens | Lake Stevens | Lake Stevens | ||
| Lake Washington | Lake Washington | Lake Washington | ||
| Lakeside | Lakeside | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | Lakeside | |
| Liberty | Arlington | Arlington | ||
| Lincoln | Lincoln | Lincoln | ||
| Lynden | Lynden | Lynden | ||
| Marysville Getchell | Marysville Getchell | Marysville Getchell | ||
| Mercer Island | Mercer Island | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 0) | Mercer Island | |
| Monroe | Monroe | Monroe | ||
| Mount Si | Mount Si | Mount Si 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Mount Vernon | Arlington | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 1) | Arlington | |
| Mountain View | Arlington | Arlington | ||
| Nathan Hale | Nathan Hale | Nathan Hale | ||
| Newport | Arlington | Arlington | ||
| North Creek | North Creek | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | North Creek | |
| North Kitsap | Arlington | Arlington | ||
| O'Dea | O'Dea | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | O'Dea | |
| Olympia | Olympia | Olympia | ||
| Orting | Orting | Orting | ||
| Overlake | Arlington | Arlington | ||
| Peninsula | Peninsula | Peninsula | ||
| Providence Classical | Providence Classical | Providence Classical | ||
| Puyallup | Arlington | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Arlington | |
| Redmond | Arlington | Arlington | ||
| Richland | Richland | Richland | ||
| Rogers | Rogers | Rogers | ||
| Roosevelt | Roosevelt | Roosevelt 2- 2 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Sammamish | Arlington | Arlington | ||
| Seattle Academy | Seattle Academy | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Seattle Academy | |
| Seattle Prep | Seattle Prep | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Seattle Prep | |
| Sedro-Woolley | Sedro-Woolley | Sedro-Woolley | ||
| Sehome | Sehome | Sehome | ||
| Selah | Selah | Selah | ||
| Shorecrest | Shorecrest | Shorecrest | ||
| Skyline | Skyline | Skyline 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Skyview | Arlington | Arlington | ||
| Snohomish | Snohomish | Snohomish | ||
| South Kitsap | Arlington | Arlington | ||
| Southridge | Arlington | Arlington | ||
| Squalicum | Arlington | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 1) | Arlington | |
| Stadium | Arlington | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Arlington | |
| Stanwood | Arlington | Arlington | ||
| Sumner | Sumner | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Sumner | |
| Tahoma | Tahoma | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Tahoma | |
| Union | Arlington | Arlington | ||
| Vashon Island | Arlington | Arlington | ||
| Walla Walla | Walla Walla | Walla Walla | ||
| Wenatchee | Wenatchee | Wenatchee | ||
| West Seattle | Arlington | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | Arlington | |
| White River | Arlington | Arlington | ||
| Woodinville | Woodinville | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Woodinville |
PowerWise = 28
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 11.34
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Glacier Peak (11- 2, 93.9) 7-12 -5.97 19.83 -0.52 0.76 -4.91
0 H Shorecrest ( 6-12, 87.4) 10-11 -12.55 13.25 -0.52 0.76 -9.88
0 A Glacier Peak (11- 2, 93.9) 4-17 -5.97 19.83 0.52 0.76 -4.12
0 A Snohomish ( 9- 5, 91.7) 2-10 -8.22 17.58 0.52 0.76 -5.82
0 A Lincoln ( 3- 6, 87.2) 3- 4 -12.71 13.09 0.52 0.76 -9.22
0 H Rogers (12- 3, 94.9) 3-19 -4.96 20.84 -0.52 0.76 -4.14
0 A Shorecrest ( 6-12, 87.4) 4- 7 -12.55 13.25 0.52 0.76 -9.09
0 H Stanwood ( 3-12, 82.7) 10- 5 -17.15 8.65 -0.52 0.76 6.15
0 H Stanwood ( 3-12, 82.7) 10- 5 -17.15 8.65 -0.52 0.76 6.15
0 H Lake Stevens ( 7- 7, 90.0) 3- 7 -9.86 15.94 -0.52 0.76 -7.85
0 H Jackson ( 0- 9, 75.1) 13- 2 -24.77 1.03 -0.52 0.76 0.38
0 H Snohomish ( 9- 5, 91.7) 9-14 -8.22 17.58 -0.52 0.76 -6.61
0 A Stanwood ( 3-12, 82.7) 7-11 -17.15 8.65 0.52 0.76 -12.57
0 A Lake Stevens ( 7- 7, 90.0) 6-10 -9.86 15.94 0.52 0.76 -7.06
0 A Nathan Hale (10- 2, 92.1) 2-10 -7.76 18.04 0.52 0.76 -5.48
------
-74.07
|
winning pts = 12.6744 losing points = -86.7398
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------