Episcopal Collegiate
W-L: ( 9- 6) PR = 91.3595Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 215 A Bentonville (16- 0, 99.9) 0- 1 222 H Springfield ( 3-11, 85.9) 19- 2 306 H Little Rock Catholic ( 3-11, 86.8) 10- 6 308 H Springdale United (13- 3, 96.2) 2-15 308 H Rogers ( 0-14, 84.0) 13- 3 309 H Bentonville (16- 0, 99.9) 4-16 315 H Fayetteville ( 6- 8, 90.0) 14- 2 319 A Little Rock Catholic ( 3-11, 86.8) 9- 3 407 A Salt County LC ( 9- 6, 91.1) 6-10 412 A Springfield ( 3-11, 85.9) 11- 8 417 H Salt County LC ( 9- 6, 91.1) 8- 4 426 A Springdale United (13- 3, 96.2) 6-21 426 A Fayetteville ( 6- 8, 90.0) 12-11 427 A Rogers ( 0-14, 84.0) 16- 6 503 N Springdale United (13- 3, 96.2) 4-17
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
222 H Springfield 19- 2 17 6 0.00
306 H Little Rock Catholic 10- 6 4 5 -0.91
308 H Springdale United 2-15 -13 -5 -0.49
308 H Rogers 13- 3 10 8 0.00
309 H Bentonville 4-16 -12 -8 0.00
315 H Fayetteville 14- 2 12 2 + 3.30
319 A Little Rock Catholic 9- 3 6 4 0.81
407 A Salt County LC 6-10 -4 0 - -3.89
412 A Springfield 11- 8 3 5 - -2.00
417 H Salt County LC 8- 4 4 1 + 3.38
426 A Springdale United 6-21 -15 -5 0.00
426 A Fayetteville 12-11 1 1 0.03
427 A Rogers 16- 6 10 7 0.00
503 N Springdale United 4-17 -13 -5 -0.13
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 407 A Salt County LC 6-10 -4 0 - -3.89 412 A Springfield 11- 8 3 5 - -2.00 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 315 H Fayetteville 14- 2 12 2 + 3.30 417 H Salt County LC 8- 4 4 1 + 3.38 |
Episcopal Collegiate Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bentonville | Bentonville | Bentonville | ||
| Fayetteville | Episcopal Collegiate | Episcopal Collegiate | ||
| Little Rock Catholic | Episcopal Collegiate | Episcopal Collegiate | ||
| Rogers | Episcopal Collegiate | Episcopal Collegiate | ||
| Salt County LC | Episcopal Collegiate | tied - ( 4- 2) ( 4- 2) | Episcopal Collegiate | |
| Springdale United | Springdale United | Springdale United | ||
| Springfield | Episcopal Collegiate | Episcopal Collegiate |
PowerWise = 5
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 14.75
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Bentonville (16- 0, 99.9) 0- 1 -0.00 15.33 0.36 0.98 -0.36
0 H Springfield ( 3-11, 85.9) 19- 2 -14.00 1.33 -0.36 0.98 0.95
0 H Little Rock Ca ( 3-11, 86.8) 10- 6 -13.09 2.24 -0.36 0.98 1.85
0 H Springdale Uni (13- 3, 96.2) 2-15 -3.67 11.66 -0.36 0.98 -3.96
0 H Rogers ( 0-14, 84.0) 13- 3 -15.33 1.00 -0.36 0.98 0.63
0 H Bentonville (16- 0, 99.9) 4-16 -0.00 15.33 -0.36 0.98 -0.36
0 H Fayetteville ( 6- 8, 90.0) 14- 2 -9.88 5.45 -0.36 0.98 5.01
0 A Little Rock Ca ( 3-11, 86.8) 9- 3 -13.09 2.24 0.36 0.98 2.56
0 A Salt County LC ( 9- 6, 91.1) 6-10 -8.80 6.53 0.36 0.98 -8.29
0 A Springfield ( 3-11, 85.9) 11- 8 -14.00 1.33 0.36 0.98 1.66
0 H Salt County LC ( 9- 6, 91.1) 8- 4 -8.80 6.53 -0.36 0.98 6.07
0 A Springdale Uni (13- 3, 96.2) 6-21 -3.67 11.66 0.36 0.98 -3.25
0 A Fayetteville ( 6- 8, 90.0) 12-11 -9.88 5.45 0.36 0.98 5.72
0 A Rogers ( 0-14, 84.0) 16- 6 -15.33 1.00 0.36 0.98 1.34
0 N Springdale Uni (13- 3, 96.2) 4-17 -3.67 11.66 -0.00 0.98 -3.61
------
5.95
|
winning pts = 25.7785 losing points = -19.8259
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------