Salt County LC
W-L: ( 9- 6) PR = 91.1013Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 223 A Fayetteville ( 6- 8, 90.0) 9- 6 223 A Bentonville (16- 0, 99.9) 2-17 308 H Rogers ( 0-14, 84.0) 14- 4 308 H Bentonville (16- 0, 99.9) 0- 1 309 A Springfield ( 3-11, 85.9) 16- 2 320 H Little Rock Catholic ( 3-11, 86.8) 9- 3 405 A Springdale United (13- 3, 96.2) 3-16 405 N Springfield ( 3-11, 85.9) 13- 5 406 A Rogers ( 0-14, 84.0) 4- 2 407 H Episcopal Collegiate ( 9- 6, 91.4) 10- 6 412 H Springdale United (13- 3, 96.2) 2-10 412 H Fayetteville ( 6- 8, 90.0) 8- 6 415 A Little Rock Catholic ( 3-11, 86.8) 12- 6 417 A Episcopal Collegiate ( 9- 6, 91.4) 4- 8 503 N Bentonville (16- 0, 99.9) 0-18
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
223 A Fayetteville 9- 6 3 1 + 2.29
223 A Bentonville 2-17 -15 -9 0.00
308 H Rogers 14- 4 10 7 0.00
309 A Springfield 16- 2 14 5 0.16
320 H Little Rock Catholic 9- 3 6 5 0.35
405 A Springdale United 3-16 -13 -5 0.00
405 N Springfield 13- 5 8 5 0.00
406 A Rogers 4- 2 2 7 - -3.00
407 H Episcopal Collegiate 10- 6 4 0 + 3.89
412 H Springdale United 2-10 -8 -5 -0.23
412 H Fayetteville 8- 6 2 1 0.56
415 A Little Rock Catholic 12- 6 6 4 1.07
417 A Episcopal Collegiate 4- 8 -4 -1 - -3.38
503 N Bentonville 0-18 -18 -9 0.00
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 406 A Rogers 4- 2 2 7 - -3.00 417 A Episcopal Collegiate 4- 8 -4 -1 - -3.38 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 223 A Fayetteville 9- 6 3 1 + 2.29 407 H Episcopal Collegiate 10- 6 4 0 + 3.89 |
Salt County LC Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bentonville | Bentonville | Bentonville | ||
| Episcopal Collegiate | Episcopal Collegiate | tied - ( 4- 2) ( 4- 2) | Episcopal Collegiate | |
| Fayetteville | Salt County LC | Salt County LC | ||
| Little Rock Catholic | Salt County LC | Salt County LC | ||
| Rogers | Salt County LC | Salt County LC | ||
| Springdale United | Springdale United | Springdale United | ||
| Springfield | Salt County LC | Salt County LC |
PowerWise = 4
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 14.75
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Fayetteville ( 6- 8, 90.0) 9- 6 -9.88 5.45 0.36 0.98 5.72
0 A Bentonville (16- 0, 99.9) 2-17 -0.00 15.33 0.36 0.98 -0.36
0 H Rogers ( 0-14, 84.0) 14- 4 -15.33 1.00 -0.36 0.98 0.63
0 H Bentonville (16- 0, 99.9) 0- 1 -0.00 15.33 -0.36 0.98 -0.36
0 A Springfield ( 3-11, 85.9) 16- 2 -14.00 1.33 0.36 0.98 1.66
0 H Little Rock Ca ( 3-11, 86.8) 9- 3 -13.09 2.24 -0.36 0.98 1.85
0 A Springdale Uni (13- 3, 96.2) 3-16 -3.67 11.66 0.36 0.98 -3.25
0 N Springfield ( 3-11, 85.9) 13- 5 -14.00 1.33 -0.00 0.98 1.31
0 A Rogers ( 0-14, 84.0) 4- 2 -15.33 1.00 0.36 0.98 1.34
0 H Episcopal Coll ( 9- 6, 91.4) 10- 6 -8.54 6.79 -0.36 0.98 6.32
0 H Springdale Uni (13- 3, 96.2) 2-10 -3.67 11.66 -0.36 0.98 -3.96
0 H Fayetteville ( 6- 8, 90.0) 8- 6 -9.88 5.45 -0.36 0.98 5.01
0 A Little Rock Ca ( 3-11, 86.8) 12- 6 -13.09 2.24 0.36 0.98 2.56
0 A Episcopal Coll ( 9- 6, 91.4) 4- 8 -8.54 6.79 0.36 0.98 -8.04
0 N Bentonville (16- 0, 99.9) 0-18 -0.00 15.33 -0.00 0.98 -0.00
------
10.42
|
winning pts = 26.3898 losing points = -15.9667
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------