2009 NCAA Men's Division II Strength of Schedule ARC
Based on Power Ratings Based on RPI
Rank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Adelphi 1 82.32 4 8 | 1 Le Moyne 1 0.75 16 1 2 NYIT 2 80.41 10 2 | 2 C. W. Post 2 0.69 15 1 3 C. W. Post 3 79.62 15 1 | 3 Merrimack 3 0.67 14 3 4 Mercyhurst 4 79.45 11 3 | 4 Wingate 4 0.67 8 8 5 Dowling 5 79.18 7 6 | 5 Mercyhurst 5 0.66 11 3 6 Le Moyne 6 78.69 16 1 | 6 Dowling 6 0.62 7 6 7 Dominican C. 7 78.40 2 12 | 7 S. New Hampshi 7 0.62 4 10 8 Pace 8 78.21 4 10 | 8 Limestone 8 0.62 10 4 9 S. New Hampshi 9 78.10 4 10 | 9 Adelphi 9 0.62 4 8 10 Merrimack 10 77.38 14 3 | 10 Pace 10 0.61 4 10 11 Wingate 11 77.36 8 8 | 11 Queens U. of C 11 0.59 8 6 12 Seton Hill 12 77.26 8 5 | 12 Mars Hill 12 0.58 11 4 13 Wheeling Jesui 13 76.62 8 4 | 13 Bentley 13 0.57 9 4 14 Limestone 14 76.57 10 4 | 14 Saint Michael' 14 0.57 7 7 15 Assumption 15 76.43 7 8 | 15 Catawba 15 0.57 4 9 16 Saint Anselm 16 76.39 8 7 | 16 NYIT 16 0.57 10 2 17 Bentley 17 76.39 9 4 | 17 Molloy 17 0.55 10 3 18 Franklin Pierc 18 76.10 1 11 | 18 Dominican C. 18 0.55 2 12 19 Grand Canyon 19 75.95 3 12 | 19 St. Andrews 19 0.54 4 12 20 Queens U. of C 20 75.91 8 6 | 20 Saint Leo 20 0.54 11 3 21 Catawba 21 75.73 4 9 | 21 Belmont Abbey 21 0.53 6 6 22 Belmont Abbey 22 75.62 6 6 | 22 Franklin Pierc 22 0.53 1 11 23 Lees-McRae 23 75.47 2 11 | 23 Seton Hill 23 0.50 8 5 24 Molloy 24 75.38 10 3 | 24 Wheeling Jesui 24 0.49 8 4 25 Saint Michael' 25 75.08 7 7 | 25 Assumption 25 0.48 7 8 26 American Inter 26 74.39 1 12 | 26 Lees-McRae 26 0.46 2 11 27 Mars Hill 27 74.37 11 4 | 27 Florida Southe 27 0.46 4 5 28 St. Andrews 28 74.18 4 12 | 28 Saint Anselm 28 0.45 8 7 29 Florida Southe 29 73.36 4 5 | 29 American Inter 29 0.45 1 12 30 Notre Dame de 30 73.29 5 4 | 30 Pfeiffer 30 0.44 7 5 31 Saint Leo 31 72.46 11 3 | 31 Dominican U. 31 0.43 6 9 32 Dominican U. 32 72.17 6 9 | 32 Grand Canyon 32 0.41 3 12 33 Pfeiffer 33 71.62 7 5 | 33 Rollins 33 0.41 2 8 34 Rollins 34 71.37 2 8 | 34 Notre Dame de 34 0.39 5 4