2016 boys Virginia VISAA Private II Strength of Schedule ARC

Based on Power Ratings Based on RPI
Rank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Christchurch 1 91.95 4 15 | 1 Christchurch 1 0.69 4 15 2 Virginia Episc 2 91.59 16 5 | 2 North Cross 2 0.64 15 4 3 North Cross 3 90.63 15 4 | 3 Trinity Christ 3 0.62 16 5 4 Covenant 4 90.42 13 5 | 4 Virginia Episc 4 0.62 16 5 5 Nansemond-Suff 5 89.37 4 11 | 5 New Covenant S 5 0.55 7 4 6 Walsingham Aca 6 88.30 1 12 | 6 Covenant 6 0.52 13 5 7 Norfolk Colleg 7 88.26 6 10 | 7 Trinity-Meadow 7 0.51 5 7 8 Hampton Roads 8 88.20 9 7 | 8 Nansemond-Suff 8 0.51 4 11 9 Roanoke Cathol 9 86.58 10 6 | 9 Seton School 9 0.48 1 6 10 Hargrave Milit 10 85.90 5 7 | 10 Tandem Friends 10 0.47 7 7 11 Fuqua School 11 84.75 0 7 | 11 Roanoke Cathol 11 0.47 10 6 12 Trinity Christ 12 84.61 16 5 | 12 Highland Schoo 12 0.47 10 8 13 Highland Schoo 13 83.53 10 8 | 13 Fredericksbug 13 0.46 0 11 14 Seton School 14 83.35 1 6 | 14 Hargrave Milit 14 0.42 5 7 15 Fredericksbug 15 82.06 0 11 | 15 Wakefield Scho 15 0.42 7 5 16 Steward School 16 81.95 3 10 | 16 Hampton Roads 16 0.41 9 7 17 Tandem Friends 17 81.52 7 7 | 17 Fredericksburg 17 0.40 9 6 18 Fredericksburg 18 81.31 9 6 | 18 Wakefield CDS 18 0.40 5 2 19 New Covenant S 19 81.30 7 4 | 19 Fishburne Mili 19 0.38 5 5 20 Fishburne Mili 20 80.64 5 5 | 20 Steward School 20 0.37 3 10 21 Wakefield Scho 21 79.24 7 5 | 21 Walsingham Aca 21 0.36 1 12 22 Trinity-Meadow 22 75.95 5 7 | 22 Fuqua School 22 0.35 0 7 23 Massanutten Mi 23 75.77 2 7 | 23 Miller School 23 0.33 4 4 24 Miller School 24 75.52 4 4 | 24 Massanutten Mi 24 0.32 2 7 25 Wakefield CDS 25 72.71 5 2 | 25 Norfolk Colleg 25 0.29 6 10