2012 boys VA Non VHSL Club Strength of Schedule ARC

Based on Power Ratings Based on RPI
Rank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Williamsburg L 1 88.72 13 2 | 1 Williamsburg L 1 0.94 13 2 2 Richmond LC 2 86.91 4 4 | 2 Richmond LC 2 0.70 4 4 3 West End LC 3 82.00 5 8 | 3 East Rockingha 3 0.62 0 6 4 Allied LC 4 80.76 0 2 | 4 Hickory LC 4 0.61 8 4 5 Rustburg LC 5 80.59 2 6 | 5 Grafton LC 5 0.57 10 2 6 East Rockingha 6 80.25 0 6 | 6 Poquoson LC 6 0.55 4 7 7 New River Vall 7 80.17 5 9 | 7 F.W.Cox LC 7 0.55 6 7 8 Cave Spring 8 79.59 4 9 | 8 Grassfield LC 8 0.53 12 6 9 Tabb LC 9 79.59 17 2 | 9 Tabb LC 9 0.52 17 2 10 Jefferson Fore 10 79.46 13 2 | 10 Cave Spring 10 0.51 4 9 11 Grassfield LC 11 79.45 12 6 | 11 Kellam LC 11 0.51 4 7 12 F.W.Cox LC 12 78.82 6 7 | 12 Maury LC 12 0.51 3 8 13 Hickory LC 13 78.34 8 4 | 13 Jefferson Fore 13 0.50 13 2 14 Poquoson LC 14 77.95 4 7 | 14 Princess Anne 14 0.49 3 7 15 Menchville LC 15 77.55 0 10 | 15 Rustburg LC 15 0.48 2 6 16 Shenandoah Nor 16 77.24 0 4 | 16 Menchville LC 16 0.48 0 10 17 Princess Anne 17 77.04 3 7 | 17 New River Vall 17 0.47 5 9 18 Great Bridge L 18 76.95 5 8 | 18 First Colonial 18 0.47 1 9 19 First Colonial 19 76.93 1 9 | 19 William Byrd 19 0.43 11 4 20 Maury LC 20 76.64 3 8 | 20 Great Bridge L 20 0.43 5 8 21 Kellam LC 21 76.37 4 7 | 21 Rooster LC 21 0.36 3 10 22 Rooster LC 22 76.19 3 10 | 22 Shenandoah Sou 22 0.25 6 5 23 Grafton LC 23 75.52 10 2 | 23 Allied LC 23 0.00 0 2 24 William Byrd 24 74.71 11 4 | 24 Shenandoah Nor 24 0.00 0 4 25 Shenandoah Sou 25 72.32 6 5 | 25 West End LC 25 0.00 5 8