2011 boys South Carolina SCHSL/SCILLStrength of Schedule ARC
Based on Power Ratings Based on RPIRank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Eastside 1 89.41 0 9 | 1 J.L. Mann Acad 1 0.65 10 3 2 Greenville 2 89.22 13 5 | 2 Riverside 2 0.64 13 3 3 Hillcrest 3 88.46 5 10 | 3 Hillcrest 3 0.63 5 10 4 Mauldin 4 88.43 10 7 | 4 Mauldin 4 0.61 10 7 5 Riverside 5 88.08 13 3 | 5 Woodmont 5 0.60 4 10 6 J.L. Mann Acad 6 87.24 10 3 | 6 Hilton Head HS 6 0.60 11 4 7 Irmo 7 86.92 6 10 | 7 Wando 7 0.59 11 2 8 Woodmont 8 86.89 4 10 | 8 Hammond School 8 0.58 2 9 9 Spartanburg Da 9 86.72 1 5 | 9 Bluffton 9 0.57 2 12 10 Hilton Head HS 10 86.21 11 4 | 10 Acad Magnet Ch 10 0.56 8 4 11 Socastee 11 86.12 2 7 | 11 Ridge View 11 0.55 5 10 12 Bluffton 12 85.90 2 12 | 12 Eastside 12 0.54 0 9 13 Spartanburg HS 13 85.73 8 5 | 13 Dorman 13 0.53 8 5 14 Bishop England 14 85.10 3 9 | 14 Irmo 14 0.53 6 10 15 Dorman 15 84.86 8 5 | 15 Spartanburg HS 15 0.52 8 5 16 Ridge View 16 84.83 5 10 | 16 Savannah LC 16 0.52 7 4 17 Hammond School 17 84.70 2 9 | 17 Socastee 17 0.52 2 7 18 Acad Magnet Ch 18 84.57 8 4 | 18 A.C. Flora 18 0.51 4 6 19 Fort Mill 19 84.47 15 2 | 19 Charleston LC 19 0.50 2 12 20 A.C. Flora 20 83.88 4 6 | 20 Fort Mill 20 0.50 15 2 21 Wando 21 83.67 11 2 | 21 Bishop England 21 0.49 3 9 22 White Knoll 22 83.12 3 6 | 22 Benedictine Mi 22 0.49 7 6 23 Charleston LC 23 82.84 2 12 | 23 Wade Hampton 23 0.48 3 11 24 Richland North 24 82.83 3 8 | 24 Blythewood 24 0.46 7 7 25 Spring Valley 25 82.36 6 8 | 25 White Knoll 25 0.46 3 6 26 Benedictine Mi 26 81.60 7 6 | 26 Richland North 26 0.44 3 8 27 Blythewood 27 81.51 7 7 | 27 Beaufort 27 0.44 4 7 28 Savannah LC 28 81.37 7 4 | 28 Columbia LC 28 0.42 2 3 29 Wade Hampton 29 80.66 3 11 | 29 Camden Mil Aca 29 0.41 8 3 30 Beaufort 30 79.40 4 7 | 30 Greenville 30 0.41 13 5 31 Columbia LC 31 79.06 2 3 | 31 Spring Valley 31 0.39 6 8 32 Camden Mil Aca 32 78.56 8 3 | 32 Spartanburg Da 32 0.23 1 5