2011 boys New York - NYC Metro/PSAL Strength of Schedule ARC

Based on Power Ratings Based on RPI
Rank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Trinity School 1 91.56 5 10 | 1 Hunter College 1 0.68 11 4 2 Collegiate 2 90.89 1 14 | 2 Long Island Ci 2 0.66 13 3 3 Fieldston 3 90.56 7 11 | 3 Trinity School 3 0.66 5 10 4 Poly Prep 4 89.78 17 3 | 4 Herbert Lehman 4 0.63 12 3 5 Hackley 5 89.65 18 3 | 5 Stuyvesant 5 0.63 9 6 6 Horace Mann 6 89.24 4 12 | 6 New Dorp 6 0.61 6 10 7 Riverdale Cou 7 89.06 14 4 | 7 Poly Prep 7 0.60 17 3 8 Dalton 8 88.94 12 7 | 8 A.P. Randolph 8 0.60 1 13 9 A.P. Randolph 9 88.43 1 13 | 9 Port Richmond 9 0.60 3 11 10 Port Richmond 10 87.95 3 11 | 10 James Madison 10 0.59 7 7 11 Albert Tuitt 11 87.67 2 11 | 11 Cardozo 11 0.57 8 6 12 Hunter College 12 87.49 11 4 | 12 Albert Tuitt 12 0.56 2 11 13 Stuyvesant 13 87.12 9 6 | 13 Collegiate 13 0.56 1 14 14 James Madison 14 87.06 7 7 | 14 Curtis 14 0.55 2 11 15 Long Island Ci 15 86.70 13 3 | 15 Portledge 15 0.54 9 7 16 Herbert Lehman 16 86.55 12 3 | 16 Tottenville 16 0.54 15 4 17 Portledge 17 84.65 9 7 | 17 Douglass Acade 17 0.54 1 11 18 Curtis 18 83.39 2 11 | 18 Columbus 18 0.54 5 8 19 Douglass Acade 19 83.31 1 11 | 19 Riverdale Cou 19 0.52 14 4 20 New Dorp 20 82.43 6 10 | 20 Fieldston 20 0.51 7 11 21 Columbus 21 82.29 5 8 | 21 Hackley 21 0.50 18 3 22 Cardozo 22 81.57 8 6 | 22 Horace Mann 22 0.50 4 12 23 Midwood 23 81.23 17 1 | 23 Midwood 23 0.49 17 1 24 Long Island Lu 24 81.18 5 6 | 24 Dalton 24 0.49 12 7 25 Tottenville 25 80.58 15 4 | 25 Long Island Lu 25 0.00 5 6