2010 boys Washington II Strength of Schedule ARC
Based on Power Ratings Based on RPIRank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Silver Lake 1 92.51 0 13 | 1 San Juan 1 0.67 14 3 2 Selah 2 91.13 2 10 | 2 Providence Cla 2 0.64 9 5 3 North County 3 90.68 2 13 | 3 Sammamish 3 0.63 14 3 4 Franklin 4 90.61 0 13 | 4 Blanchet 4 0.63 12 3 5 Whatcom 5 90.24 6 8 | 5 Lynnwood 5 0.62 16 3 6 Skagit Valley 6 90.09 3 10 | 6 Roosevelt 6 0.62 11 4 7 Woodinville 7 89.95 4 11 | 7 Whatcom 7 0.61 6 8 8 Providence Cla 8 89.72 9 5 | 8 North County 8 0.61 2 13 9 Stanwood 9 89.47 9 5 | 9 Silver Lake 9 0.61 0 13 10 San Juan 10 89.38 14 3 | 10 Garfield 10 0.60 8 6 11 Highline 11 88.95 3 10 | 11 Stanwood 11 0.60 9 5 12 Wenatchee 12 88.73 15 2 | 12 Redmond 12 0.59 8 6 13 Garfield 13 88.66 8 6 | 13 Selah 13 0.59 2 10 14 Lynnwood 14 88.66 16 3 | 14 Liberty 14 0.58 2 11 15 Nathan Hale 15 88.41 6 10 | 15 Mount Si 15 0.58 0 13 16 Snohomish 16 88.39 13 4 | 16 Skagit Valley 16 0.57 3 10 17 Blanchet 17 88.17 12 3 | 17 Port Angeles 17 0.57 7 7 18 Roosevelt 18 88.06 11 4 | 18 Franklin 18 0.56 0 13 19 Three Rivers 19 87.36 8 6 | 19 Highline 19 0.56 3 10 20 Mount Si 20 86.66 0 13 | 20 Gig Harbor 20 0.56 7 9 21 Liberty 21 86.25 2 11 | 21 Klahowya 21 0.56 11 4 22 Lake Washingto 22 85.53 15 3 | 22 Lake Washingto 22 0.56 15 3 23 Port Angeles 23 84.49 7 7 | 23 Woodinville 23 0.54 4 11 24 Sammamish 24 84.44 14 3 | 24 Three Rivers 24 0.54 8 6 25 Redmond 25 84.36 8 6 | 25 South Kitsap 25 0.53 4 10 26 North Kitsap 26 84.10 3 11 | 26 Nathan Hale 26 0.52 6 10 27 Gig Harbor 27 83.97 7 9 | 27 North Kitsap 27 0.52 3 11 28 South Kitsap 28 83.68 4 10 | 28 Snohomish 28 0.48 13 4 29 Klahowya 29 83.40 11 4 | 29 Wenatchee 29 0.47 15 2