2010 boys South Carolina SCHSL/SCILLStrength of Schedule ARC
Based on Power Ratings Based on RPIRank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Bluffton 1 87.28 4 9 | 1 Spartanburg HS 1 0.67 7 6 2 A.C. Flora 2 86.11 2 10 | 2 Wando 2 0.67 12 2 3 Greenville 3 86.07 14 2 | 3 J.L. Mann Acad 3 0.63 8 6 4 Socastee 4 85.19 6 7 | 4 Hilton Head HS 4 0.63 14 2 5 Bishop England 5 85.10 0 7 | 5 Blythewood 5 0.62 7 8 6 Wando 6 84.94 12 2 | 6 Riverside 6 0.62 11 2 7 White Knoll 7 84.48 3 8 | 7 Irmo 7 0.62 12 3 8 Spartanburg HS 8 84.33 7 6 | 8 White Knoll 8 0.62 3 8 9 Hilton Head HS 9 83.71 14 2 | 9 A.C. Flora 9 0.60 2 10 10 J.L. Mann Acad 10 83.67 8 6 | 10 Woodmont 10 0.58 8 7 11 Riverside 11 82.93 11 2 | 11 Spring Valley 11 0.57 2 11 12 Eastside 12 82.87 2 7 | 12 Fort Mill 12 0.56 13 2 13 Wade Hampton 13 82.34 0 10 | 13 Mauldin 13 0.54 6 5 14 Mauldin 14 82.23 6 5 | 14 Bluffton 14 0.54 4 9 15 Charleston LC 15 81.89 1 10 | 15 Greenville 15 0.54 14 2 16 Blythewood 16 81.82 7 8 | 16 Camden Mil Aca 16 0.52 6 9 17 Irmo 17 81.56 12 3 | 17 Eastside 17 0.50 2 7 18 Spring Valley 18 81.40 2 11 | 18 Benedictine Mi 18 0.50 5 5 19 Fort Mill 19 81.37 13 2 | 19 Bishop England 19 0.49 0 7 20 Camden Mil Aca 20 81.26 6 9 | 20 Dorman 20 0.49 5 6 21 Benedictine Mi 21 81.08 5 5 | 21 Spartanburg Da 21 0.49 1 8 22 Dorman 22 80.94 5 6 | 22 Savannah LC 22 0.48 5 6 23 Woodmont 23 80.93 8 7 | 23 Wade Hampton 23 0.46 0 10 24 Spartanburg Da 24 80.91 1 8 | 24 Charleston LC 24 0.46 1 10 25 Heathwood Hall 25 79.98 4 5 | 25 Ridge View 25 0.45 9 6 26 Savannah LC 26 79.98 5 6 | 26 Heathwood Hall 26 0.44 4 5 27 Hillcrest 27 79.61 2 8 | 27 Hammond School 27 0.44 13 3 28 Richland North 28 78.61 0 6 | 28 Socastee 28 0.42 6 7 29 Ridge View 29 78.58 9 6 | 29 Hillcrest 29 0.42 2 8 30 Beaufort 30 77.92 1 7 | 30 Richland North 30 0.39 0 6 31 Hammond School 31 77.73 13 3 | 31 Beaufort 31 0.38 1 7