2010 boys New York - Section II Strength of Schedule ARC
Based on Power Ratings Based on RPIRank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Niskayuna 1 89.23 17 5 | 1 Burnt Hills 1 0.73 10 9 2 Guilderland 2 89.02 11 7 | 2 Shenendehowa 2 0.71 18 2 3 Columbia 3 88.70 0 17 | 3 Bethlehem 3 0.71 12 7 4 Ballston Spa 4 88.63 5 12 | 4 Saratoga Spgs 4 0.70 7 11 5 Shaker 5 88.55 9 8 | 5 Colonie 5 0.63 7 11 6 Shenendehowa 6 88.25 18 2 | 6 Columbia 6 0.63 0 17 7 Saratoga Spgs 7 88.21 7 11 | 7 Glens Falls 7 0.61 11 7 8 Burnt Hills 8 88.16 10 9 | 8 South Glens Fa 8 0.60 4 13 9 Bethlehem 9 87.71 12 7 | 9 LaSalle Instit 9 0.59 9 8 10 Colonie 10 87.19 7 11 | 10 Schenectady 10 0.58 8 9 11 Christian Bros 11 84.11 13 5 | 11 Albany Academy 11 0.58 14 4 12 LaSalle Instit 12 83.30 9 8 | 12 Troy 12 0.55 7 10 13 Schenectady 13 82.88 8 9 | 13 Niskayuna 13 0.53 17 5 14 South Glens Fa 14 81.86 4 13 | 14 Johnstown 14 0.51 4 14 15 Albany Academy 15 81.23 14 4 | 15 Guilderland 15 0.50 11 7 16 Queensbury 16 80.89 14 4 | 16 Shaker 16 0.50 9 8 17 Troy 17 79.54 7 10 | 17 Queensbury 17 0.49 14 4 18 Glens Falls 18 79.49 11 7 | 18 Ballston Spa 18 0.49 5 12 19 Scotia-Glenvil 19 79.21 10 7 | 19 Christian Bros 19 0.49 13 5 20 Amsterdam 20 78.82 3 13 | 20 Scotia-Glenvil 20 0.48 10 7 21 Johnstown 21 77.01 4 14 | 21 Cambridge Cent 21 0.47 3 13 22 Cambridge Cent 22 75.94 3 13 | 22 Amsterdam 22 0.46 3 13 23 Lansingburgh 23 75.94 6 10 | 23 Lansingburgh 23 0.45 6 10 24 Schuylerville 24 74.89 6 9 | 24 Greenwich Cent 24 0.43 11 5 25 Greenwich Cent 25 74.49 11 5 | 25 Schuylerville 25 0.39 6 9