2010 boys New York - NYC Metro/PSAL Strength of Schedule ARC
Based on Power Ratings Based on RPIRank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Trinity School 1 93.55 3 12 | 1 Curtis 1 0.65 13 3 2 Fieldston 2 93.33 8 10 | 2 Long Island Ci 2 0.63 13 3 3 Dalton 3 92.01 7 11 | 3 Columbus 3 0.63 12 2 4 Riverdale Cou 4 91.84 11 6 | 4 Sports Profess 4 0.63 0 1 5 Poly Prep 5 91.13 11 5 | 5 Portledge 5 0.61 4 9 6 Hackley 6 90.96 17 4 | 6 Port Richmond 6 0.60 4 10 7 Collegiate 7 90.04 5 12 | 7 Poly Prep 7 0.60 11 5 8 Sports Profess 8 88.86 0 1 | 8 Stuyvesant 8 0.60 8 7 9 Horace Mann 9 88.74 10 8 | 9 Riverdale Cou 9 0.60 11 6 10 James Madison 10 88.44 1 12 | 10 Collegiate 10 0.59 5 12 11 Douglass Acade 11 87.84 1 13 | 11 Douglass Acade 11 0.59 1 13 12 Cardozo 12 86.53 7 9 | 12 James Madison 12 0.59 1 12 13 Columbus 13 85.68 12 2 | 13 A.P. Randolph 13 0.59 4 10 14 New Dorp 14 85.15 10 7 | 14 Trinity School 14 0.58 3 12 15 Tottenville 15 84.96 10 6 | 15 Herbert Lehman 15 0.58 11 4 16 Portledge 16 84.96 4 9 | 16 Tottenville 16 0.56 10 6 17 Midwood 17 84.68 13 6 | 17 New Dorp 17 0.55 10 7 18 Albert Tuitt 18 83.31 0 13 | 18 Albert Tuitt 18 0.55 0 13 19 Port Richmond 19 82.49 4 10 | 19 Hackley 19 0.55 17 4 20 A.P. Randolph 20 81.86 4 10 | 20 Fieldston 20 0.54 8 10 21 Long Island Lu 21 81.71 2 15 | 21 Horace Mann 21 0.51 10 8 22 Stuyvesant 22 81.52 8 7 | 22 Cardozo 22 0.50 7 9 23 Hunter College 23 81.49 2 5 | 23 Hunter College 23 0.48 2 5 24 Curtis 24 81.19 13 3 | 24 Midwood 24 0.41 13 6 25 Long Island Ci 25 80.88 13 3 | 25 Dalton 25 0.40 7 11 26 Herbert Lehman 26 79.83 11 4 | 26 Long Island Lu 26 0.00 2 15