2010 boys CA Non-CIF Club Strength of Schedule ARC
Based on Power Ratings Based on RPIRank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Petaluma 1 88.73 3 9 | 1 Santa Rosa 1 0.75 12 4 2 Santa Rosa 2 87.93 12 4 | 2 El Segundo 2 0.73 14 5 3 Casa Grande 3 87.68 20 2 | 3 Simi Valley 3 0.67 9 2 4 Napa 4 86.79 6 7 | 4 Petaluma 4 0.64 3 9 5 Yuba City 5 85.54 4 7 | 5 Gold Country 5 0.63 10 4 6 Pleasant Grove 6 85.24 3 10 | 6 Napa 6 0.61 6 7 7 Rancho Cotati 7 85.19 9 6 | 7 South Valley 7 0.61 10 4 8 Sierra Foothil 8 85.11 0 13 | 8 El Camino 8 0.60 10 4 9 Gold Country 9 84.39 10 4 | 9 San Francisco 9 0.59 12 3 10 Skyline 10 84.30 1 7 | 10 Desert Valley/ 10 0.58 3 11 11 Morgan Hill 11 83.45 3 11 | 11 Folsom United 11 0.57 7 8 12 Chico 12 83.23 11 4 | 12 Casa Grande 12 0.57 20 2 13 South Valley 13 82.97 10 4 | 13 Edison 13 0.57 7 5 14 Simi Valley 14 82.81 9 2 | 14 Pleasant Grove 14 0.56 3 10 15 San Francisco 15 82.78 12 3 | 15 Pasadena 15 0.56 6 6 16 Folsom United 16 82.75 7 8 | 16 Sierra Foothil 16 0.56 0 13 17 Redding 17 82.67 5 9 | 17 Morgan Hill 17 0.55 3 11 18 Orangevale 18 81.61 9 4 | 18 Redding 18 0.55 5 9 19 Stockton 19 81.53 1 12 | 19 Valencia 19 0.55 9 4 20 San Jose 20 81.18 8 6 | 20 Orangevale 20 0.55 9 4 21 El Segundo 21 81.14 14 5 | 21 Glendale 21 0.55 7 7 22 Edison 22 79.31 7 5 | 22 San Jose 22 0.54 8 6 23 Long Beach 23 79.29 1 12 | 23 Long Beach 23 0.54 1 12 24 El Camino 24 79.23 10 4 | 24 Torrance 24 0.53 8 4 25 Desert Valley/ 25 79.06 3 11 | 25 Yuba City 25 0.53 4 7 26 Granada Hills 26 78.81 0 13 | 26 Granada Hills 26 0.51 0 13 27 Pasadena 27 78.50 6 6 | 27 Skyline 27 0.50 1 7 28 Torrance 28 77.68 8 4 | 28 Rancho Cotati 28 0.49 9 6 29 Glendale 29 76.90 7 7 | 29 Stockton 29 0.48 1 12 30 Valencia 30 76.66 9 4 | 30 Chico 30 0.47 11 4 31 Saugus 31 75.32 3 6 | 31 Saugus 31 0.40 3 6