Region = UT BenLo Nickname = T Vikings Coach = Chase NyeGAME LIST
Team Power Rating = 94.9625244 Date Opponent Conference (W-L, PR) Score 321 A Jordan UT Wasatc ( 9- 5, 93.9) 11-10 328 H Sky View UT BenLo ( 7- 6, 82.0) 12- 3 401 A Mountain Crest UT BenLo ( 4- 9, 78.4) 15- 3 408 A Box Elder UT BenLo ( 0-12, 67.4) 19- 2 411 H Pleasant Grove UT Canyon ( 4- 8, 77.5) 13- 1 415 H Alta UT Wasatc ( 7-10, 86.5) 4- 2 427 A Judge Memorial UT Wasatc ( 4-10, 84.0) 8- 5 428 H Logan UT BenLo ( 8- 5, 85.4) 6- 2 429 H Bonneville UT BenLo ( 6- 7, 84.0) 9- 1 502 A Bingham UT Wasatc (13- 4, 94.5) 6- 8 504 A Fremont UT BenLo ( 7- 6, 82.9) 8- 5 506 H Weber UT BenLo ( 1-11, 73.0) 15- 2 514 H Bountiful UT GrSalt ( 8- 6, 83.9) 16- 3 516 H Oakley UT GrSalt (10- 4, 92.4) 10- 4 518 N Riverton UT Wasatc (12- 4, 94.8) 3- 9PREDICTION LIST
------------------------------------- |Real = actual goal margin | |Pred = predicted goal margin | |+ = slightly above prediction | |++ = above prediction | |+++ = well above prediction | |- = slightly below prediction | |-- = below prediction | |--- = well below prediction | |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) | | prediction | |n/a = Outside division | ------------------------------------- Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 321 A Jordan 11-10 1 0 0.78 328 H Sky View 12- 3 9 13 -1.00 401 A Mountain Crest 15- 3 12 15 0.00 408 A Box Elder 19- 2 17 26 0.00 411 H Pleasant Grove 13- 1 12 17 0.00 415 H Alta 4- 2 2 8 --- -6.77 427 A Judge Memorial 8- 5 3 10 --- -7.00 428 H Logan 6- 2 4 9 -- -5.93 429 H Bonneville 9- 1 8 11 - -2.00 502 A Bingham 6- 8 -2 0 -1.62 504 A Fremont 8- 5 3 11 --- -7.00 506 H Weber 15- 2 13 22 0.00 514 H Bountiful 16- 3 13 11 0.00 516 H Oakley 10- 4 6 2 + 3.03 518 N Riverton 3- 9 -6 0 -- -5.96UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
/
LOCAL RATING BASED ON POWER RATING Local Power Rating....... 94.71 Local Power Rank........... 4 Local SOS Rating......... 65.74 Local SOS Rank............. 18 Local RPI Rating......... 0.59 Local RPI Rank............. 7 Championship Probability . 0.1 Championship Rank ....... 29 Local Quality Win Rating.120.00 Local Quality Win Rank..... 6 LOCAL PERFORMANCE BASED ON POWER RATING Ave Offensive Goals .... 10.3 Ave Defensive Goals ...... 4.0 Wins/Losses(all )...... 13- 2 Ave Goal diff (all )..... 6.3 Wins/Losses(top 5)...... 0- 1 Ave Goal diff (top 5)..... -6.0 Wins/Losses(top 10)...... 2- 2 Ave Goal diff (top 10)..... -0.2 Wins/Losses(top 20)...... 7- 2 Ave Goal diff (top 20)..... 3.2 Wins/Losses(last 3)...... 2- 1 Ave Goal diff (last 3)..... 4.3