boys 2004 NY/Sec. 3 Strength of Schedule ARC
Based on Power Ratings Based on RPIRank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Auburn 1 91.02 7 10 | 1 Baldwinsville 1 0.73 10 10 2 Baldwinsville 2 90.10 10 10 | 2 Cazenovia Cent 2 0.70 9 10 3 West Genesee 3 89.81 23 1 | 3 Jamesville-Dew 3 0.68 12 9 4 Henninger 4 89.29 15 5 | 4 Skaneateles 4 0.68 19 2 5 Fayetteville-M 5 89.10 15 5 | 5 Christian Bros 5 0.67 7 11 6 Oswego 6 88.83 3 14 | 6 Jordan-Elbridg 6 0.65 11 8 7 Liverpool 7 88.64 7 11 | 7 East Syracuse- 7 0.63 16 6 8 Corcoran 8 87.89 8 11 | 8 Auburn 8 0.63 7 10 9 East Syracuse- 9 87.67 16 6 | 9 Nottingham 9 0.62 11 7 10 Central Square 10 87.24 1 17 | 10 Westhill 10 0.61 8 11 11 Lafayette 11 86.93 19 4 | 11 Marcellus 11 0.61 9 11 12 Nottingham 12 86.90 11 7 | 12 Henninger 12 0.60 15 5 13 Jamesville-Dew 13 86.82 12 9 | 13 Watertown IHC 13 0.59 16 4 14 Tully 14 86.63 4 14 | 14 Watertown HS 14 0.59 16 3 15 Christian Bros 15 86.61 7 11 | 15 Bishop Ludden 15 0.57 2 16 16 Homer 16 86.51 8 11 | 16 West Genesee 16 0.57 23 1 17 Skaneateles 17 86.48 19 2 | 17 Central Square 17 0.57 1 17 18 Cicero-North S 18 86.37 10 9 | 18 General Brown 18 0.56 3 13 19 Jordan-Elbridg 19 86.24 11 8 | 19 Chittenango 19 0.56 2 16 20 Bishop Ludden 20 86.12 2 16 | 20 Homer 20 0.56 8 11 21 General Brown 21 85.95 3 13 | 21 Carthage 21 0.55 16 4 22 Cazenovia Cent 22 85.79 9 10 | 22 Liverpool 22 0.54 7 11 23 Westhill 23 85.73 8 11 | 23 Oswego 23 0.54 3 14 24 Chittenango 24 84.62 2 16 | 24 Fayetteville-M 24 0.53 15 5 25 Carthage 25 84.46 16 4 | 25 New Hartford 25 0.53 14 5 26 South Jefferso 26 84.34 7 11 | 26 Tully 26 0.53 4 14 27 Watertown HS 27 84.16 16 3 | 27 Lafayette 27 0.52 19 4 28 Marcellus 28 84.12 9 11 | 28 Indian River 28 0.48 9 10 29 Cortland 29 84.11 14 6 | 29 Corcoran 29 0.47 8 11 30 Lowville 30 83.82 5 13 | 30 South Jefferso 30 0.47 7 11 31 Watertown IHC 31 83.78 16 4 | 31 Cicero-North S 31 0.47 10 9 32 New Hartford 32 81.68 14 5 | 32 Cortland 32 0.46 14 6 33 Indian River 33 81.37 9 10 | 33 Lowville 33 0.44 5 13 34 Fulton 34 80.56 7 9 | 34 Fulton 34 0.44 7 9 35 Whitesboro 35 79.64 5 11 | 35 Clinton 35 0.43 3 11 36 Clinton 36 77.08 3 11 | 36 Whitesboro 36 0.41 5 11 37 Rome Free Acad 37 76.04 12 6 | 37 Rome Free Acad 37 0.37 12 6 38 Manlius-Pebble 38 72.51 2 11 | 38 Manlius-Pebble 38 0.37 2 11 39 Utica Proctor 39 60.03 0 2 | 39 Utica Proctor 39 0.09 0 2